Factbox: Five things to look for in
Mueller's Trump-Russia report
Send a link to a friend
[April 08, 2019]
By Nathan Layne
(Reuters) - Attorney General William Barr
has provided only a glimpse of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report
on the inquiry into Russia's role in the 2016 U.S. election, with many
details expected to emerge when the document is finally released.
Barr on March 24 sent a four-page letter to lawmakers detailing
Mueller's "principal conclusions" including that the 22-month probe did
not establish that President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign team conspired
with Russia. Barr said he found insufficient evidence in Mueller's
report to conclude that Trump committed obstruction of justice, though
the special counsel did not make a formal finding one way or the other
on that.
The attorney general has pledged to release the nearly 400-page report
by mid-April, but has said portions will be blacked out to protect
certain types of sensitive information.
Here are five things to look for when the report is issued.
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: WHY NO EXONERATION?
Perhaps the biggest political risk for Trump is the special counsel's
supporting evidence behind Mueller's assertion that while the report
does not conclude the Republican president committed the crime of
obstruction of justice it "also does not exonerate him" on that point.
According to Barr's March 24 letter, Mueller has presented evidence on
both sides of the question without concluding whether to prosecute. Barr
filled that void by asserting there was no prosecutable case. But Barr's
statement in the letter that "most" of Trump's actions that had raised
questions about obstruction were "the subject of public reporting"
suggested that some actions were not publicly known.
Democrats in Congress do not believe Barr, a Trump appointee, should
have the final say on the matter. While the prospect that the
Democratic-led House of Representatives would begin the impeachment
process to try to remove Trump from office appears to have receded, the
House Judiciary Committee will be looking for any evidence relevant to
ongoing probes into obstruction of justice, corruption and abuse of
power by the president or others in the administration.
Barr's comment that most of what Mueller probed on obstruction has been
publicly reported indicates that events like Trump's firing of James
Comey as FBI director in May 2017 when the agency was heading the Russia
inquiry are likely to be the focus of this section of the report.
RUSSIAN 'INFORMATION WARFARE' AND CAMPAIGN CONTACTS
The report will detail indictments by Mueller of two Kremlin-backed
operations to influence the 2016 election: one against a St.
Petersburg-based troll farm called the Internet Research Agency accused
of waging "information warfare" over social media; and the other
charging Russian intelligence officers with hacking into Democratic
Party servers and pilfering emails leaked to hurt Democratic candidate
Hillary Clinton.
With those two indictments already public and bearing no apparent link
to the president, the focus may be on what Mueller concluded, if
anything, about other incidents that involved contacts between Russians
and people in Trump's orbit. That could include the June 2016 meeting at
Trump Tower in New York in which a Russian lawyer promised "dirt" on
Clinton to senior campaign officials, as well as a secret January 2017
meeting in the Seychelles investigated as a possible attempt to set up a
back channel between the incoming Trump administration and the Kremlin
while Democrat Barack Obama was still president.
Any analysis of such contacts could shed light on why Mueller, according
to Barr's summary, "did not establish that members of the Trump campaign
conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election
interference activities."
MANAFORT, UKRAINE POLICY AND POLLING DATA
In the weeks before Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort was
sentenced in March to 7-1/2 years in prison mostly for financial crimes
related to millions of dollars he was paid by pro-Russia Ukrainian
politicians, Mueller's team provided hints about what their pursuit of
him was really about.
[to top of second column]
|
Special Counsel Robert Mueller departs after briefing the U.S. House
Intelligence Committee on his investigation of potential collusion
between Russia and the Trump campaign on Capitol Hill in Washington,
U.S., June 20, 2017. REUTERS/Aaron P. Bernstein/File Photo
Prosecutor Andrew Weissmann told a judge in February that an Aug. 2,
2016 meeting between Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik, a consultant
Mueller has said has ties to Russian intelligence, "went to the
heart of" the special counsel's investigation.
The meeting included a discussion about a proposal to resolve the
conflict in Ukraine in terms favorable to the Kremlin, an issue that
has damaged Russia's relations with the West. Prosecutors also said
Manafort shared Trump campaign polling data with Kilimnik, although
the significance of that act remains unclear.
One focus will be on what Mueller ultimately concluded about
Manafort's interactions with Kilimnik and whether a failed attempt
to secure cooperation from Manafort, who was found by a judge to
have lied to prosecutors in breach of a plea agreement,
significantly impeded the special counsel's work.
NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERNS
While Mueller did not find a criminal conspiracy with Russia,
according to Barr, there is a chance the report will detail behavior
and financial entanglements that give fodder to critics who have
said Trump has shown a pattern of deference to the Kremlin.
One example of such an entanglement was the proposal to build a
Trump tower in Moscow, a deal potentially worth hundreds of millions
of dollars that never materialized. Michael Cohen, Trump's former
personal lawyer, admitted to lying to Congress about the project to
provide cover because Trump on the campaign trail had denied any
dealings with Russia.
In the absence of criminal charges arising from Mueller's inquiry,
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has shifted his
focus to whether Trump is "compromised" by such entanglements,
influencing his policy decisions and posing a risk to national
security.
Some legal experts have said the counterintelligence probe Mueller
inherited from Comey may prove more significant than his criminal
inquiry, though it is not clear to what degree counterintelligence
findings will be included in the report. Barr also has said he
planned to redact material related to intelligence-gathering sources
and methods.
MIDDLE EAST INFLUENCE AND OTHER PROBES
Another focus is whether Mueller will disclose anything from his
inquiries into Middle Eastern efforts to influence Trump.
One mystery is what, if anything, came of the special counsel's
questioning of George Nader, a Lebanese-American businessman and
consultant to the crown princes of the United Arab Emirates and
Saudi Arabia who started cooperating with Mueller last year.
Nader attended the Seychelles meeting. He also was present at a
Trump Tower meeting in August 2016, three months before the
election, at which an Israeli social media specialist spoke with the
president's son, Donald Trump Jr., about how his firm Psy-Group,
which employed several former Israeli intelligence officers, could
help the Trump campaign, according to the New York Times. Mueller's
interest in Nader suggested the special counsel looked into whether
additional countries sought to influence the election and whether
they did so in concert with Russia.
A lawyer for Nader did not respond to a request for comment.
Barr has said he will redact from the Mueller report information on
"other ongoing matters," including inquiries referred to other
offices in the Justice Department. That makes it unclear if any
findings related to the Middle East will appear in the report.
(Compiled by Nathan Layne in New York; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |