Mueller report will be released within a
week: U.S. attorney general
Send a link to a friend
[April 10, 2019]
By Sarah N. Lynch
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Attorney
General William Barr told lawmakers on Tuesday that he intends to
release "within a week" a redacted version of the long-awaited report on
Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election from Special
Counsel Robert Mueller.
During a congressional hearing, Barr was repeatedly challenged by
Democrats who raised suspicions that he may have misrepresented
Mueller's report to paint the Republican president in a better light.
Barr, an appointee of Trump who last month announced what he said were
the main findings of the report, said he would be as open as possible
about redactions of sensitive information when he hands over the full
document.
"Within a week I will be in position to release that report to the
public and then I will engage with the chairmen of both judiciary
committees about that report, about any further requests that they
have," Barr said at his first appearance before Congress since receiving
the report on March 22.
"I don't intend at this stage to send the full unredacted report to the
committee," Barr told a House of Representatives Appropriations
subcommittee. "I am relying on my own discretion to make as much public
as I can."
Tuesday's hearing came a little more than two weeks after Mueller
wrapped up a 22-month-long probe into whether members of Trump's
campaign colluded with Russia during the White House race and if he
obstructed official inquiries into the matter.
The impending release of the 400-page report is expected to shed light
on some of the more contentious episodes of Trump's election bid and
presidency, including his firing of FBI head James Comey in 2017 and his
campaign's contacts with Russians.
The investigation, which Trump has repeatedly called a witch hunt,
ensnared 34 people and three companies, including some members of
Trump's inner circle such as his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort
and former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
In a March 24 letter to Congress, Barr said that Mueller's investigation
did not establish that members of Trump's election campaign conspired
with Russia. He also said that Mueller presented evidence "on both
sides" about whether Trump obstructed justice, but he did not draw a
conclusion one way or the other.
Barr said that he reviewed Mueller's evidence and made his own
determination that Trump should not face obstruction charges.
The lack of details in Barr's letter, his decision not to charge Trump
and his refusal to release the report in full without redactions has
angered Democrats, who fear he may be sugar coating Mueller's findings.
REDACTION
Redacted official documents or reports typically have sections blacked
out to protect sensitive information.
Barr gave no indication of how much of the report will be obscured but
said he was working with Mueller on restricting details about secret
grand jury information, U.S. intelligence gathering and ongoing criminal
cases as well as potentially damaging information about peripheral
players who were not charged in the Russia probe.
[to top of second column]
|
U.S. Attorney General William Barr testifies on the Justice
Department’s budget proposal before a House Appropriations
Subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., April 9,
2019. REUTERS/Aaron P. Bernstein
To be transparent about what would be redacted, he told lawmakers he
intends to "color code the excisions from the report" and provide
"explanatory notes describing the basis for each redaction."
Barr left open the possibility that some members of Congress would
be allowed to review secret information from the report in a safe
setting.
"I can envision a situation where under appropriate safeguards, that
information can be shared," Barr said. "I also think under
appropriate safeguards, there is a way of people verifying these
categories (of redactions) were not abused."
Democrats repeatedly criticized Barr for his handling of the report,
including taking it upon himself in the letter to decide that Trump
should not be charged with obstruction of justice.
Nita Lowey, chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee, said
Barr's letter summarizing the Mueller report appears to "cherry-pick
from the report to draw the most favorable conclusion possible for
the president."
"In many ways, your letter raises more questions than it answers,"
she added.
The New York Times and the Washington Post reported last week that
some investigators on Mueller's team were unhappy with the way Barr
described their findings. The reports said that some of the evidence
against Trump was more damning than Barr's letter indicated.
Barr said he did not have insight into why some on Mueller's team
were upset. "I suspect that they probably wanted more put out," he
said.
Barr said he did not offer to let Mueller help draft his four-page
March 24 letter to Congress on the conclusions of the special
counsel's investigation. Asked why, Barr said, "Because it was my
letter."
He said the White House did not review the letter to Congress laying
out Mueller's findings before he sent it.
Last week, Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee prepared
subpoenas that they plan to issue to the Justice Department if Barr
does not agree to release the Mueller report in full.
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch and Doina Chiacu; Editing by Kevin
Drawbaugh and Alistair Bell)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|