Trump's Fed picks draw political fire as
they angle for the job
Send a link to a friend
[April 10, 2019]
By Ann Saphir and Trevor Hunnicutt
(Reuters) - A political feud over President
Donald Trump’s picks for the U.S. Federal Reserve Board broke into an
open brawl on Tuesday even before the nominations of Herman Cain, a
former restaurant chain executive, and Stephen Moore, a conservative
economic commentator, have been formally submitted to the Senate.
Cain and Moore, both overt loyalists to the president, in recent days
have waged unprecedented public campaigns for the Fed jobs, with both
eagerly endorsing Trump's economic policies and Moore pledging to
"accommodate" those policies once he is at the Fed.
The central bank's leadership prides itself on its nonpartisan
stewardship over the world's biggest economy, and views political
independence as key to its ability to carry out monetary policy
effectively.
On Tuesday, Democrats including Senator Chuck Schumer and Joint Economic
Committee Vice Chair Carolyn Maloney took public aim at the pair's
qualifications, with Maloney saying that Moore is "superbly
underqualified for the role for which he has been nominated."
And at least four Republican Senators indicated they could break ranks
on Cain, enough to sink his chances for the required approval in the
Senate.
The Trump administration is "probably going to hear from a number of our
members about concerns that they have" about Cain, John Thune, the
Republican whip in the Senate, told Politico.
Another Republican senator, John Cornyn, said, "Before the president
starts floating names ... we need to have a conversation about who is
actually confirmable up here," according to a Twitter post by New York
Times reporter Glenn Thrush.
Cain and Moore are battling hard for the two vacant seats on the Federal
Reserve's Board of Governors, positions that would give them a say for
years on interest-rate policy and bank regulation.
In recent days they have taken to social media and the airwaves to
promote themselves and lash out at critics and anyone they view as
standing in the way of Trump’s agenda or his prospects for reelection.
In an interview with Reuters on Tuesday, Moore trumpeted his agenda for
economic growth and again took aim at critics.
“There are a lot of people on the left that are afraid of my ideas. They
realize that they couldn’t defeat me based on my ideas, because they’re
popular, and they’re right, so that leads to this kind of smear
campaign, which is ugly," Moore said.
"I have a pretty populist agenda that I’m pursuing, which is more
growth, higher wages, more transparency and more sunlight on how the Fed
operates," Moore said, calling those priorities "the right things to do"
and saying that he wants “to talk directly to the American people."
"NOT SO FAVORABLY INCLINED"
Cain and Moore's open politicking is a departure from past practice,
with confirmation of Fed nominees typically a sleepy process of quizzing
candidates, mostly economists with doctoral degrees, about their views
on monetary policy and banking oversight.
Lewis Alexander, chief U.S. economist at Nomura Securities, said it was
positive "for people's views to be known," but he added a note of
caution. "It is certainly not a part of the Federal Reserve's mandate to
promote the chances of reelection of a particular president."
[to top of second column]
|
The Federal Reserve Board building on Constitution Avenue is
pictured in Washington, U.S., March 27, 2019. REUTERS/Brendan
McDermid/File Photo
Trump has repeatedly criticized the Fed for raising rates, saying
that rate hikes are holding back the economy. His pick of Moore and
former Republican presidential candidate Cain has been seen by
critics as a means to put pressure on the central bank to ease
policy and help him politically.
Moore and Cain have kept up unusually public profiles. Cain's has
included digs against Democrats ("lunatic liberals," he said Monday
on Facebook) and gays (a Tuesday tweet linked to a piece on Floyd
Brown's Western Journal that portrays gays as unnatural).
Cain has said he would not be disappointed if he does not get the
Fed job, but has repeatedly brought it up on his daily show. In a
video posted Tuesday, Cain said "a lot of people ... do not like the
fact" that he is under consideration and are trying to discourage
the administration from nominating him because of his conservative
political leanings. "The decision's going to be made basically on
the facts," he said.
Cain remains co-chair of the America Fighting Back PAC, which was
co-founded by Brown to promote Trump's reelection. Cain's photo and
name were used as recently as last month in a letter raising funds
to oppose a group of 12 senators if they ever "cross" Trump.
Two of those senators are on the Senate Banking Committee, the first
stop in a two-step Senate approval process for any Fed nominee.
Brown, who was the founding chairman of Citizens United, said in an
interview that Cain has stepped back from day-to-day involvement in
the PAC. Cain did not respond to requests from Reuters for comment.
Moore in radio and TV interviews has praised Trump's economic record
and embraced easing monetary policy, a stance that Trump himself has
vigorously promoted.
People "are not going to vote against someone who has been this
successful on the economy," Moore said on Monday, adding in another
interview that day that he is "looking forward to getting over to
the Fed."
Cain's candidacy appeared by late Tuesday to be drawing the most
political fire. Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski told The Hill that
she is "not so favorably inclined" on Cain, whose 2012 run for
president was derailed by claims of sexual harassment, which he has
denied.
Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell declined to publicly
endorse him, the Washington Post reported.
It is not the first time a Fed nominee has faced political
opposition. In 2011 Republicans scuttled the nomination by
Democratic President Barack Obama of Peter Diamond, a Nobel laureate
in economics and MIT professor, for what Republican Senator Richard
Shelby then said was a lack of experience and appropriate policy
preferences.
(Reporting by Ann Saphir and Trevor Hunnicutt; Additional reporting
by Howard Schneider; Editing by Leslie Adler)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |