Apple, allies seek billions in U.S. trial testing
Qualcomm's business model
Send a link to a friend
[April 15, 2019]
By Stephen Nellis
(Reuters) - Apple Inc and its allies on
Monday will kick off a jury trial against chip supplier Qualcomm Inc in
San Diego, alleging that Qualcomm engaged in illegal patent licensing
practices and seeking up to $27 billion in damages.
Qualcomm, for its part, alleges that Apple forced its longtime business
partners to quit paying some royalties and is seeking up to $15 billion.
Filed by Apple in early 2017, the lawsuit in federal court revolves
around the modem chips that connect devices like the iPhone or Apple
Watch to wireless data networks. Qualcomm has spent the past two years
mounting a pressure campaign of smaller legal skirmishes against Apple,
seeking - and in some cases obtaining - iPhone sales bans for violating
its patents.
The trial before Judge Gonzalo Curiel will play out on Qualcomm's home
turf of San Diego, where for decades the city's National Football League
team played in Qualcomm Stadium and nearly every business district hosts
the mobile chip firm's logo.
For Apple, the trial is about the freedom to determine its own
technology path for blockbuster products by buying chips without having
to pay what it calls a "tax" on its innovations in the form of patent
licensing fees to Qualcomm that take a cut of the selling price of its
devices.
For Qualcomm, the trial, along with similar allegations from U.S.
regulators in a January court hearing, will determine the fate of its
unique blend of selling chips and licensing more than 130,000 patents.
Licensing generates most of Qualcomm profits. The model propelled
Qualcomm from a small contract research and development shop when
founded in 1985 to a global chip powerhouse important enough to U.S.
national security that President Donald Trump personally intervened to
prevent a hostile takeover of the company last year.
“This is the day of reckoning that Qualcomm has been very fortunate to
avoid for many years," said Gaston Kroub, a patent attorney with Kroub,
Silbersher & Kolmykov who is not involved in the case. "In Apple,
they’ve finally come up against a potential licensee that has the
resources and the will to put Qualcomm's business model and licensing
practices on trial.”
[to top of second column] |
The logo of Apple is seen at a store in Zurich, Switzerland January
3, 2019. REUTERS/Arnd Wiegmann/File Photo
Qualcomm requires device makers to sign a license to its patents before it will
supply chips, which it views as a commonsense measure to ensure it does not do
business with companies violating its patents. But Apple and other device makers
around the world have called the "no license, no chips" policy a form of "double
dipping" - that is, charging for the same intellectual property once during
licensing discussions, and then again in the price of the chips where the
patents are embodied.
Apple and allies are asking for an end to that practice and a refund of about $9
billion - an amount that could be tripled if a jury finds in Apple's favor for
antitrust allegations - for contract factories such as Hon Hai Precision
Industry Co Ltd's Foxconn, who paid the royalties and were reimbursed by Apple.
Apple alleges the practices kept rivals like Intel Corp out of the market for
years.
"Even very big companies like Intel have felt at a disadvantage," said Michael
Salzman, an antitrust attorney with Hughes Hubbard & Reed not involved in the
case.
Qualcomm will argue that it had been working successfully with contract
factories for years before Apple introduced its iPhone. But Apple used its heft
in the industry to get those factories to break their longstanding contracts
with Qualcomm, depriving it of at least $7 billion in royalties it was due, the
chip supplier alleges.
The chip supplier will also argue that its licensing practices have been
consistent for decades and only came under fire when Apple, known in the
electronics industry for pushing suppliers to contain costs, took issue with it.
A victory would secure Qualcomm's status as a major technology provider for 5G,
the next generation of mobile data networks coming online this year.
"I don't think (a Qualcomm victory) would be great for Apple, but if it's about
money, they've got plenty of money," said Stacy Rasgon, an equity analyst for
Bernstein who follows Qualcomm. "For Qualcomm, it's an existential attack on the
meat of their business model."
(Reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |