The plaintiffs are trying to establish that talent agency
"packaging fees," in which an agent is paid directly by the
writer's employer instead of getting paid a 10 percent
commission fee from the writer, are illegal under both
California and federal law.
In recent decades, packaging fees have become the standard form
of compensation for the four largest talent agencies, which have
grown in power and reach amid a wave of consolidation.
The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleges that
because packaging fees are generally tied to a show's revenue
and profits, the agencies are incentivized to reduce the amount
production companies pay writers and other talent on a show.
As such, packaging fees violate California fiduciary law, the
suit claims, because they pit the interests of the agency
against those of its writer client. The fees also violate the
state's Unfair Competition Law, the suit maintains, because they
amount to an illegal "kickback" from production companies to
agencies.
The four agencies named in the complaint - William Morris
Endeavor, Creative Artists Agency, United Talent Agency and ICM
Partners - receive over 80 percent of the packaging fees paid by
Hollywood studios and networks, according to the WGA.
[to top of second column] |
The Association of Talent Agencies (ATA), whose members include
the four defendants in Wednesday's lawsuit, said the filing was
a sign that the WGA "is on a predetermined path to chaos that
never included any intention to negotiate."
"Knowing that it could take months or even years for this
litigation to be resolved, WGA leaders are unnecessarily forcing
their members and our industry into long-term uncertainty," ATA
executive director Karen Stuart said in a statement.
The relationship between the WGA and the Association of Talent
Agencies, has been governed by a 43-year-old agreement that
regulates how agents represent writers. After negotiations over
a new, updated agreement fell apart, the WGA asked agents to
sign a new code of contact that would eliminate packaging fees.
The majority of agents refused, and on Friday the WGA told its
members to fire agents that had not signed the new code.
(Reporting by Helen Coster and Jill Serjeant; Additional
reporting by Lisa Richwine; Editing by Tom Brown and Michael
Perry)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |