| 
					
 
 Illinoisans pay some of the highest property taxes in the 
country, but homeowners in the two counties surrounding Springfield pay the 
14th-highest property tax rate among the nation’s large communities. 
 
The average household in the Springfield area last year paid 2.33% of the value 
of their home in property taxes, or $3,176. That ranks the metro area covering 
Sangamon and Menard counties 14th in the nation for areas with at least 200,000 
residents, according to ATTOM Data Solutions. It is also double the national 
average in 2018 of paying 1.16% of a single-family home’s value in property 
taxes. 
 
In Sangamon County, residential property taxes outgrew home values by 49% 
between 1996 and 2016. That translates to $446 worth of property tax increases 
per person when adjusted for inflation. 
   
It would be one thing if the property tax hikes were boosting services, but 
pensions are driving property tax increases and outpacing taxpayers’ ability to 
pay. All of the property tax levied by the city of Springfield goes to pay for 
pensions. 
 
Sangamon County property taxpayers see 95 cents of every $1 taxed for municipal 
police go to pensions, and the entire $1 taxed for fire services go to pensions. 
Growing pension obligations crowd out services and tie the hands of local 
governments during the budget process. 
 
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker is trying to convince state lawmakers to ask 
Illinois voters for a constitutional amendment allowing for a progressive income 
tax. Supporters claim the “fair tax” will be a magic solution to the financial 
woes plaguing the state. However, without serious pension reform, any 
progressive tax proposal will be consumed by pensions and inevitably lead to tax 
hikes on all Illinoisans. 
 
Illinois voters in key state House districts oppose Pritzker’s plan.
 
  
 [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
  
			In Democrat state Rep. Sue Scherer’s district – 
			which covers Decatur and parts of Springfield – residents dislike 
			Pritzker’s plan. Voters in the district view Pritzker favorably by 
			31% to 28%, but they oppose his plan to change to a progressive tax 
			41% to 32% – regardless of whether they have heard of his proposal. 
			Given brief descriptions of both flat and progressive income taxes, 
			voters said they would vote against changing to a progressive income 
			tax, 50% to 39%. To amend the state constitution, 60% of voters must 
			approve the proposed amendment. 
			Pritzker’s proposed progressive tax rates fall 
			short of their $3.4 billion revenue target by at least $1 billion, 
			according to an Illinois Policy Institute analysis. While Pritzker 
			hinged many of his promises on increased revenue from a progressive 
			tax, a new ad from Think Big Illinois – a group which lists Pritzker 
			among their major donors – walks back the promise of tax relief for 
			97% of Illinoisans to only claim taxes will not be raised on them. 
			 
			And in a walk back to the walk back, Pritzker told WLS-TV, Channel 
			7, in Chicago he couldn’t guarantee his tax plan won’t raise taxes 
			later on those making less than $250,000 a year. 
			 
			“As you know, we currently live in a system in which the taxes can 
			be changed at any moment so there’s certainly no guarantees, but 
			what I will tell you is that I am fighting for the plan that I put 
			forward,” he said April 23. 
			
			
			  
			The Illinois Constitution doesn’t need an amendment to remove 
			protection of the flat income tax. Illinois needs to amend the state 
			constitution to protect already earned pension benefits, while 
			allowing for changes to future, unearned accruals. 
			 
			For Springfield area homeowners who face one of the highest 
			effective property tax rates, a progressive tax would depress job 
			growth, accelerate population loss and leave fewer working families 
			to share the property tax burden. And with Pritzker refusing to 
			guarantee middle-class residents won’t face a state income tax 
			increase, the only guarantee is of higher taxes and even more 
			residents fleeing the burden. 
			 
			Residents should contact their lawmakers and ask them to vote 
			against the progressive tax amendment. Illinois needs pension 
			reform, not higher taxes. 
			
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article  |