| 
		New Trump rule targets poor and could cut legal immigration in half, 
		advocates say
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [August 13, 2019] 
		By Daniel Trotta and Mica Rosenberg 
 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's 
		administration unveiled a sweeping rule on Monday that some experts say 
		could cut legal immigration in half by denying visas and permanent 
		residency to hundreds of thousands of people for being too poor.
 
 The long-anticipated rule, pushed by Trump's leading aide on 
		immigration, Stephen Miller, takes effect Oct. 15. It would reject 
		applicants for temporary or permanent visas if they fail to meet high 
		enough income standards or if they receive public assistance such as 
		welfare, food stamps, public housing or Medicaid.
 
 "The Trump administration is trying to bypass Congress and implement its 
		own merit based-immigration system. It's really a backdoor way of 
		prohibiting low-income people from immigrating," said Charles Wheeler of 
		the Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc.
 
 The rule is part of Republican Trump's efforts to curb both legal and 
		illegal immigration, an issue he has made a cornerstone of his 
		presidency.
 
		
		 
		After the rule was announced, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) 
		said it would file a lawsuit to stop it from taking effect. The group's 
		executive director said the rule was racially motivated. The state 
		attorneys general of California and New York threatened to sue.
 The 837-page rule, seeking to target those who could become "public 
		charges" in the United States, could be the most drastic of all the 
		Trump administration's policies targeting the legal immigration system, 
		experts have said. It could deny visas to people for not making enough 
		money or who are drawing public benefits.
 
 The government estimates the status of 382,000 immigrants could 
		immediately be reviewed on those grounds. Immigrant advocates fear the 
		real number could be much higher, especially if the rule is extended to 
		the millions of people who apply for U.S. visas at American consulates 
		around the world.
 
 The State Department already changed its foreign affairs manual in 
		January 2018 to give diplomats wider discretion in deciding visa denials 
		on public charge grounds. In the fiscal year that ended last September, 
		the number of visas denied on those grounds quadrupled compared to the 
		previous year.
 
 "This is an end run around Congress to achieve through executive fiat 
		what the administration cannot get through Congress," said Doug Rand, 
		co-founder of Boundless, a pro-migrant group that helps families 
		navigate the U.S. immigration system.
 
 The rule is intended to scare immigrants away from using public benefits 
		to which they are legally entitled, Rand said, adding that a study by 
		Boundless found it could eliminate more than half of visa applicants.
 
 A 2018 study by the Migration Policy Institute found 69 percent of 
		already established immigrants had at least one negative factor against 
		them under the administration's wealth test, while just 39 percent had 
		one of the heavily weighed positive factors.
 
 Other immigrant advocates have expressed concern the rule could 
		negatively affect public health by dissuading immigrants from using 
		health or food aid. The Trump administration estimates its rule will 
		save $2.47 billion annually in spending on public benefits.
 
		The rule is derived from the Immigration Act of 1882, which allows the 
		U.S. government to deny a visa to anyone likely to become a "public 
		charge."
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			New American citizens wave American flags after taking the Oath of 
			Allegiance during a naturalization ceremony in Newark, New Jersey, 
			U.S., March 1, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Segar 
            
 
            DEFINING 'PUBLIC CHARGE'
 Ken Cuccinelli, the acting director of U.S. Citizenship and 
			Immigration Services (USCIS), said at a White House media briefing 
			that the law has always required foreign nationals to rely on their 
			own resources, with help from relatives and sponsors, but the term 
			"public charge" was never clearly defined.
 
 "That is what changes today with this rule," Cuccinelli said.
 
 The new rule defines public charge as an immigrant who receives one 
			or more designated public benefits for more than 12 months within 
			any 36-month period.
 
 The definition of public benefits is cash aid including Supplemental 
			Security Income, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, the 
			Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), most forms of 
			Medicaid, and a variety of public housing programs, officials said.
 
 "The principle driving it is an old American value and that's 
			self-sufficiency," Cuccinelli said in a Fox News interview.
 
 Whether someone is public charge will be determined on a variety of 
			positive and negative factors. A positive factor would be earning 
			125 percent of the poverty line, which is $12,490 for an individual 
			and $25,750 for a family of four, while earning less would be a 
			negative factory.
 
 'HUDDLED MASSES'
 
 Critics have decried the effort to limit legal immigration for 
			lower-income people affront to the ideals of the United States 
			highlighted by the inscription on the Statue of Liberty that reads 
			"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to 
			breathe free."
 
 Trump aide Miller, asked in 2017 about whether the administration's 
			policies countered that inscription, said the words were not 
			original to the monument.
 
 Cuccinelli was also asked about the inscription at the White House 
			on Monday and said: "I do not think, by any means, we are ready to 
			take anything off the Statue of Liberty."
 
            
			 
            
 In early 2018, Trump rejected a bipartisan effort in Congress to 
			reform the immigration system. The effort became embroiled in 
			controversy over accusations by a Democratic senator that the 
			Republican president disparaged African and Caribbean nations with a 
			vulgarity in regard to their immigrants. Trump was reported to have 
			asked why the United States could not get more immigrants form 
			northern Europe.
 
 Trump has denied using that language and said he wanted immigrants 
			to come the United States from all nations.
 
 (Reporting by Daniel Trotta in New York; Additional reporting by 
			Mica Rosenberg in New York and Susan Heavey and Makini Brice in 
			Washington; Editing by Bill Trott and Grant McCool)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |