Boeing aims to strengthen engineering oversight after panel review
Send a link to a friend
[August 30, 2019] By
Eric M. Johnson
EVERETT, Wash. (Reuters) - Boeing Co needs
to reorganize its engineering reporting lines company-wide and ensure
higher ranking officials, including its CEO, get faster feedback about
potential safety concerns from lower levels of the company, according to
an internal review at the U.S. planemaker following two recent fatal
crashes.
The initial recommendations, presented to Boeing's board of directors
over the weekend, also include potentially creating a new permanent
committee to review Boeing's aircraft design and development, company
officials told Reuters.
The new initiatives come from a special board panel set up to review how
Boeing develops and builds aircraft after the two crashes. They are
intended to boost the transparency of engineering decisions and
accelerate efforts to share safety information as widely and swiftly as
possible across Boeing's global businesses and factories.
Speaking to Reuters at an internal Safety Promotion Center at its
manufacturing hub north of Seattle, Boeing Chief Executive Officer
Dennis Muilenburg vowed to learn from the crashes as part of what he
described as Boeing's role "to preserve and improve" the safety of
global aviation over time.
"Our job is to make sure accidents don't happen," Muilenburg said.
"Whatever the cause is, we are going to learn, we are going to
understand and we are going to make improvements."
"Ultimately, what we learn from the crashes will be reflected here as
well," Muilenburg added, referring to the hall of exhibits that
highlight how some accidents have had an impact on the ways planes are
designed and operated. Safety experts say this is part of a wider
organized learning process credited with a sharp improvement in safety
over the decades.
A new addition to the center is a roughly six-foot wall of glass with
water running over its face that bears the words, "remembering those
whose lives were lost in flight," along with the exact times of the
crashes of Lion Air flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines flight 302, and a
tally of the dead.
The committee's recommendations are the first structural shifts as part
of the company's response to the ongoing crisis over the grounding of
its 737 MAX after deadly accidents killed 346 people in Ethiopia and
Indonesia. The changes will be rolled out over the next couple of
months, pending further review and modifications, he said.
Changes within the company could also be informed by the outcome of
crash investigations into both accidents, according to a Boeing
spokesman.
[to top of second column] |
A worker walks past unpainted Boeing 737 MAX aircraft seen parked in
an aerial photo at Renton Municipal Airport near the Boeing Renton
facility in Renton, Washington, U.S. July 1, 2019. Picture taken
July 1, 2019. REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson
Muilenburg now receives granular weekly reports of potential safety issues
discussed at meetings of rank-and-file engineers - something that did not happen
in the past. Those engineers, numbering in the thousands, will report to chief
engineers as opposed to being allocated to separate programs - a change designed
to help them reach senior Boeing officials more effectively, though their
specific jobs will not change.
GLOBAL SCRUTINY
The proposed changes are designed to give greater line-of-sight from the
company's top management into the heart of its industrial programs.
Engineers currently meet to flag and debate potential safety issues on a weekly
basis, known internally as safety review boards. The committee recommended
"elevating" the meetings to higher raking officials including Muilenburg to add
more "transparency and visibility," he said. "I'm now getting weekly reports
that are very valuable."
The board's review is just one of numerous probes into the development of the
737 MAX by global regulators and U.S. lawmakers and the Department of Justice.
Boeing also faces more than 100 lawsuits by victims' families alleging it
designed a flawed airplane and other issues.
Boeing has apologized for the lives lost and is upgrading critical flight
control software at the center of both crashes. But it has stopped short of
admitting any faults in how it developed the 737 MAX, or the software, which
repeatedly pushed the plane's nose down while the pilots struggled to intervene.
"We have been very thorough in looking at every step of the design process,
certification process, going all the way back to the original requirements,"
Muilenburg said. "We feel very confident in how that was done. But that doesn't
mean we stop learning."
No employee has been fired over the development of the 737 MAX, he said.
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Chief Engineer John Hamilton told Reuters that
Boeing and European rival Airbus SE meet several times a year to share data on
safety.
"The next time we get together, I am sure we will be sharing learnings from the
MAX accidents," Hamilton said.
(Editing by Tim Hepher and Edward Tobin)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |