U.S. Supreme Court justices lean toward insurers on $12 billion
Obamacare claims
Send a link to a friend
[December 11, 2019]
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court
justices on Tuesday appeared sympathetic to claims made by health
insurers seeking $12 billion from the federal government under a program
set up by the Obamacare law aimed at encouraging them to offer medical
coverage to previously uninsured Americans.
The justices considered a challenge by a group of insurers of a lower
court's ruling that Congress had suspended the government's obligation
to make such payments. The insurers have said that ruling constituted a
"bait-and-switch" that would enable the government to withhold money the
companies were promised.
The court's four liberal justices, in addition to Chief Justice John
Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, all asked questions indicating they
are inclined to vote for the insurers.
"Why doesn't the government have to pay its contracts just like
everybody else?" said Justice Stephen Breyer.
Moda Health Plan Inc and other insurers sued in an effort to compel the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to make the payments. The
program in question was designed to help insurers recover from early
losses they suffered after the 2010 passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
under Democratic former President Barack Obama.
The law, dubbed Obamacare, has enabled millions of Americans who
previously had no medical coverage to obtain insurance, including those
with pre-existing medical conditions.
Unlike other court cases involving Obamacare, this dispute before the
justices concerns only payments to insurers and does not directly
challenge the law itself.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito seemed most supportive of the
government.
"Has there ever been a case where this court has, in effect, required
Congress to appropriate ... billions of dollars for private businesses?"
he asked the insurers' lawyer, Paul Clement.
Other insurers involved in the case include Blue Cross and Blue Shield
of North Carolina, Maine Community Health Options and Land of Lincoln
Mutual Health Insurance Company.
[to top of second column]
|
A sign on an insurance store advertises Obamacare in San Ysidro, San
Diego, California, U.S., October 26, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake
If the Supreme Court sides with the insurers, it could result in a
significant one-time cash infusion for major companies such as
Humana Inc, Anthem Inc and Centene Corp, according to a note by
Evercore ISI. Shares of all three were up slightly on Tuesday.
Payments would have come through the law's risk corridor program
designed to mitigate insurers' risks from 2014 to 2016, when they
sold coverage to previously uninsured people through exchanges
established under the ACA.
Under the program, insurers that paid out significantly less in
claims on policies sold through the exchanges than they took in from
premiums provided some of their gains to the government. Insurers
that paid out more were entitled to government compensation for part
of their losses.
Roberts questioned whether any of the insurers would have
participated in the program if the payments were not available.
"Its a good business opportunity for them because the government
promised to pay," he said.
Republicans, who have opposed Obamacare from the outset and numerous
times sought to repeal it in Congress, have called the risk corridor
program a "bailout" for the insurance industry.
From 2015 through 2017, Congress each year passed appropriations
bills that included language barring HHS from using general funds to
pay the government's risk corridor obligations.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled 2-1 in 2018
that Congress effectively repealed its obligation to pay the
insurers.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Additional reporting by Nate Raymond
in Boston; Editing by Bill Berkrot)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|