Congressional negotiators still face
unresolved border security issues
Send a link to a friend
[February 05, 2019]
By Susan Cornwell and Richard Cowan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - With time running
down, congressional negotiators on U.S. border security funding have not
settled the hot-button issues that confront them, but lawmakers
expressed optimism on Monday that a deal could be struck before a Feb.
15 deadline.
"I think there's a real effort by both Republicans and Democrats, both
in the House and Senate to come together - more so than I've seen in a
long time," said Senator Patrick Leahy, one of 17 negotiators, and a
senior Senate Appropriations Committee Democrat.
Republican Senator Richard Shelby, who chairs the appropriations panel
and is also one of the negotiators, told reporters that border patrol
experts would brief lawmakers soon.
"We are going to find out what they think ... what do we need on the
border," adding: "We’re trying to create a dynamic to bring us
together.”
Such positive talk was still a ways from nailing down a deal. The
toughest unresolved disputes include the type of new physical barriers
along the U.S.-Mexico border, if any, as President Donald Trump demands
$5.7 billion for a wall that most Democrats and many Republicans say
would be wasteful and ineffective.
Trump has warned lawmakers they are "wasting their time" if they are not
discussing "a wall or physical barrier."
Shelby warned that if the lawmakers failed to agree, he thought Trump
would declare a national emergency, using money already appropriated by
Congress for other activities to build his wall.
While Democrats and several Republicans have warned Trump against doing
that, Shelby said he would support such a move by Trump, although the
senator preferred a legislative solution.
Republican Senator Roy Blunt, also a border security negotiator, said:
"There are significant constitutional questions about the president's
ability to just decide that the Congress is wrong and he's right."
[to top of second column]
|
Construction on the border wall with Mexico (top) is shown in New
Mexico near Sunland Park, New Mexico, U.S. June 18, 2018.
REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo
Other difficult questions facing lawmakers, according to
congressional aides, include whether to increase or cut funds for
immigrant detention beds and the numbers of immigration
law-enforcement agents and immigration judges.
Democrats had been backing legislation providing up to $1.6 billion
for additional fencing on some parts of the border, far below
Trump's request for a wall that he originally envisioned as a
2,000-mile (3,200-km) concrete barrier.
But new fencing money was not included in an initial proposal
Democrats sketched out last week, which did call, however, for a
$589 million increase in DHS’ budget.
Some liberal Democrats potentially complicated matters by pressing
for cuts in homeland security spending.
Representative Pramila Jayapal, co-chair of the liberal
Congressional Progressive Caucus, told reporters she agreed with
sentiments expressed in a letter circulated by four members of that
group, which seeks Department of Homeland Security funding cuts.
Dated Jan. 29, the letter said the Trump administration had "abused
their authority and the fidelity of public resources," with
initiatives that included separating immigrant children from their
families.
(Reporting by Susan Cornwell and Richard Cowan; Editing by Susan
Thomas and Peter Cooney)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|