| 
		Exclusive: Facing crackdown in Canada, 
		drugmakers offered billions in price cuts 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [February 06, 2019] 
		By Allison Martell and Anna Mehler Paperny 
 TORONTO (Reuters) - Canadian pharmaceutical 
		industry lobby groups, in an effort to head off a planned crackdown on 
		prescription drug prices, offered to give up C$8.6 billion ($6.6 
		billion) in revenue over 10 years, freeze prices or reduce the cost of 
		treating rare diseases, according to interviews and documents seen by 
		Reuters.
 
 Those industry offers did not impress federal officials, coming last 
		year as Canada prepared to expand the powers of a little-known federal 
		watchdog called the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) to 
		reduce the cost of prescription drugs.
 
 The government proposals would change the countries Canada compares its 
		prices to, dropping the United States where they are highest, and set a 
		formula to assess cost-effectiveness of medicines.
 
 Announced in 2017, the new rules were scheduled to come into effect last 
		month but have been delayed as the government reviews feedback, which 
		has some wondering if they will ever be implemented.
 
 The delay is a setback for supporters of the changes. But documents 
		detailing counter offers from lobby groups Innovative Medicines Canada 
		and BIOTECanada show an industry struggling to win over federal 
		officials.
 
		
		 
		
 Unlike other countries with universal healthcare, Canada's 
		government-funded healthcare system does not cover prescription drugs. 
		Most Canadians rely on an expensive patchwork of public and private 
		insurance plans for that. Among industrialized nations, only the United 
		States and Switzerland spend more on prescriptions per capita.
 
 Declan Hamill, a vice president at Innovative Medicines Canada, said the 
		proposed regulations go too far and could hurt patient access to new 
		drugs in Canada. But his group recognizes that the Canadian government 
		wants to make drugs more affordable, he said.
 
 "We'd like to help the government out with that, and we've been trying 
		to have discussions with them," Hamill said.
 
 Lower prices in Canada could eventually hit drugmakers in the most 
		lucrative U.S. market, as Washington evaluates a proposal to base drug 
		prices paid under the government's Medicare program on the cost of 
		medicines in other developed nations, including Canada.
 
 Global drugmakers, including Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co, Amgen Inc 
		and others, have argued against the Canadian proposal. They referred 
		questions back to Innovative Medicines Canada.
 
 'WOULD NOT ACHIEVE THE GOAL'
 
 With major drugmakers united in their condemnation of proposed 
		regulations to rein in prices, Health Canada hired former Bank of Canada 
		governor David Dodge and health economist Åke Blomqvist to assess the 
		government proposal. Their review, completed in August 2018, broadly 
		endorsed the government's plan, documents seen by Reuters showed.
 
 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's senior ministers will eventually decide 
		how to proceed. PMPRB Executive Director Douglas Clark told Reuters the 
		new regime could be running by early 2020.
 
 "People have a tendency to presume that the sky is falling," Clark said. 
		"I think it's a little early for people to panic and lament the demise 
		of this policy initiative."
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			A pharmacist counts pills in a pharmacy in Toronto in this January 
			31, 2008 file photo. REUTERS/Mark Blinch/Files 
            
 
            Health Canada said the industry's offers do not address drug price 
			problems created by outdated rules.
 "The non-regulatory counter-proposals that Innovative Medicines 
			Canada and BIOTECanada jointly submitted to the government would not 
			achieve the goal of ensuring appropriate consumer protection in 
			these circumstances," the ministry said in an emailed statement.
 
 One offer was to "secure a price reduction target of C$8.6 billion" 
			in net present value terms, according to a letter from officials 
			seen by Reuters.
 
 Hamill said the C$8.6 billion figure was borrowed from a government 
			estimate of how much the PMPRB reforms would reduce revenue and 
			would have been spread over 10 years. He did not say exactly how it 
			would have worked. Total patented medicine sales were C$16.8 billion 
			($12.8 billion) in 2017, according to the PMPRB.
 
 Health Canada also rejected an offer to freeze prescription drug 
			prices, saying it would not meet its objective of lowering prices.
 
 Health Canada said the industry had also committed to improving 
			access for patients with rare diseases, but that proposal would not 
			help those who have drug plans.
 
 Meanwhile, ahead of a fall election, Trudeau's government is 
			preparing to announce a limited expansion of the nation's universal 
			healthcare system to cover part of the cost of prescription 
			medicines, as drug plans grapple with the extremely high cost of 
			newer specialty drugs.
 
 'WE DON'T WANT TO SHUT THAT DOOR'
 
 The PMPRB caps prices of drugs still under patent protection. If new 
			regulations are adopted, it would change the list of countries whose 
			drug pricing it uses to decide whether costs are excessive, dropping 
			the United States and adding countries with lower prices.
 
 The regulator would also consider for the first time a type of 
			value-based pricing, measuring how cost-effective drugs are in terms 
			of quality-adjusted life years, and force drug companies to 
			privately disclose some confidential discounts.
 
 It is not entirely clear how the PMPRB would use its new powers. In 
			documents posted online, the agency said it could apply new rules to 
			drugs already on the market. But Health Canada said the regime would 
			not apply to those.
 
            
			 
            
 Andrew Casey, president of BIOTECanada, would like "a more rigorous 
			sit-down" with the government.
 
 "I fear the consequences when you do something without really 
			working with industry," he said. "We don't want to shut that door."
 
 (Additional reporting by Fergal Smith in Toronto; editing by Denny 
			Thomas and Bill Berkrot)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |