| 
		 STATEWIDE 
		$15 MINIMUM WAGE HIKE CLEARS ILLINOIS SENATE, ADVANCES TO HOUSE 
		Illinois Policy Institute/ 
		Vincent Caruso 
		As Pritzker’s minimum wage bill advances to 
		the House, the new administration’s first major victory may come with a 
		$1.1 billion price tag, courtesy of Illinois taxpayers. | 
        
            | 
 Lawmakers in the Illinois Senate on Feb. 7 passed a bill that 
would raise the statewide minimum wage to $15 by Jan. 1, 2025. Senate Bill 1 
cleared the upper chamber by 39-18, and now advances to the Illinois House of 
Representatives. 
 Gov. J.B. Pritzker made clear his desire to pass a minimum wage increase before 
delivering his first budget address on Feb. 20. With the Senate not in session 
next week, the upper chamber was under pressure to send a minimum wage bill to 
the House before Feb. 8. The House has a little more than a week to send the 
bill to the governor’s desk before the budget address.
 
 While Prtizker offered few details about the cost, a memo from the governor’s 
office obtained Feb. 5 by WCIA-TV included a forecast of the cost just for state 
workers’ wage increases: nearly $1.1 billion.
 
 [to top of second column]
 That estimate does not include the cost of local government workers’ wage 
increases, which municipalities are likely to pay for by hiking Illinois’ 
already-high property taxes. While the Illinois Association of Park Districts 
raised concerns about how they would weather a minimum wage hike, local 
governments have been missing from the conversation at the state level.
 
 Not all communities share the same socio-economic characteristics. While labor 
organizations favor the prospect of higher wages for low-income earners, 
increasing labor costs often harms the people the measures are intended to help. 
Small business advocates such as the National Federation of Independent Business 
have called the proposal a “job killer,” while the Illinois Retail Merchants 
Association endorsed a plan that takes regional differences into account.
 
 Phase-in ramp
 
 SB 1 would phase in a $15 minimum wage between fiscal years 2020 and 2025, 
starting with a $1 increase from $8.25 to $9.25 in 2020 – followed by a 75-cent 
jump to $10 that same year. The wage would rise in $1 increments annually until 
reaching $15 in fiscal year 2025. The schedule would be slightly different for 
tipped workers, whose minimum wage is 40 percent lower to account for 
gratuities. For park districts, which employ many teen workers, the minimum wage 
will instead increase to $13, according to WCIA-TV.
 
 The proposal also includes a tax credit schedule first outlined in the memo. 
Businesses with 50 employees or fewer would receive a tax credit equivalent to 
25 percent of the cost of their wage increases in fiscal year 2020. The benefit 
would decline with the wage increases, eventually flattening at 5 percent in 
2025. Business with fewer than five employees could continue receiving the 5 
percent credit until fiscal year 2030.
 
 Economic impact
 
 Pritzker’s push for Illinois to adopt a $15 minimum wage comes amid the “Fight 
for $15” movement’s efforts to see the same wage mandate enacted nationally.
 
 Evidence suggests higher wages can boost productivity for individuals who are 
already employed. But advocates of minimum wage increases ignore rises in 
unemployment numbers and in how long idled workers remain out of a job.
 
 
 | 
 Evidence suggests higher 
			minimum wage levels lead to fewer jobs. This is particularly true 
			for low-skill jobs, which are often the first to decline in response 
			to a rise in the minimum wage. A 2018 University of 
			Wisconsin, Madison study on the effects of Minnesota’s 2014 minimum 
			wage hike – which was also phased in over a number of years – offers 
			a recent example of this. In the years immediately following 
			Minnesota’s minimum wage hike, the study found youth employment fell 
			by 9 percent and service industry employment overall fell by 4 
			percent.
 Moreover, empirical evidence suggests minimum wages do not elevate 
			low-income families, nor reduce most forms of public assistance.
 
 The purpose of raising the minimum wage is to increase take-home pay 
			for low-income families. So long as such an increase reduces job 
			creation for those families, it cannot accomplish that goal.
 
 A pro-growth alternative
 
 Illinois may become one of only five states to mandate a minimum 
			wage as high as $15. New Jersey became the fourth state to sign a 
			$15 minimum wage into law Feb. 4. Illinois’ current $8.25 statewide 
			minimum wage is in line with the national median.
 
 This minimum wage hike would take the heaviest toll on state 
			finances since the Pritzker administration took office, but it is 
			not the first hit. Despite inheriting a budget deficit of $2.8 
			billion, Pritzker granted $100 million in pay raises to unionized 
			state workers the day after his inauguration.
 
 Moody’s Investors Service took note of the poor budget outlook Feb. 
			5, reiterating the state’s need to address its massive unfunded 
			pension liability, structural deficits and the economic consequences 
			of its declining population.
 
			
			 
 State lawmakers’ policy failures have plunged job growth in Illinois 
			to among the slowest in the nation. The 2011 “temporary” income tax 
			hike cost the state $56 billion in investment, shrinking employment 
			by 9,300 jobs, and caused output per worker to decline by $7,200. 
			The impact of the 2017 tax hike will likely be similar.
 
 For Illinoisans to prosper, lawmakers must confront the main source 
			of the state’s economic plight. The Illinois Policy Institute 
			recently unveiled a plan that would balance the state budget, pay 
			off its debts and cut taxes in five years. The resulting economic 
			growth would invite investment back to the state, thereby increasing 
			the quantity and quality of jobs.
 
 Raising the cost of doing business in Illinois is only likely to 
			further repel investment, and further depress Illinois’ already-weak 
			jobs climate. Those lowest on the socio-economic scale would bear 
			the brunt of that downturn.
 
 While policies such as the $15 minimum wage are intended to help 
			those most in need, creating new barriers keeps them at a 
			disadvantage.
 
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article |