Exclusive: U.S. considers withdrawal of zero tariffs for
India - sources
Send a link to a friend
[February 08, 2019]
By Sanjeev Miglani and Neha Dasgupta
NEW DELHI (Reuters) - India could lose a
vital U.S. trade concession, under which it enjoys zero tariffs on $5.6
billion of exports to the United States, amid a widening dispute over
its trade and investment policies, people with close knowledge of the
matter said.
A move to withdraw the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) from
India, the world’s largest beneficiary of a scheme that has been in
force since the 1970s, would be the strongest punitive action against
India since President Donald Trump took office in 2017 vowing to reduce
the U.S. deficit with large economies.
Trump has repeatedly called out India for its high tariffs.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has courted foreign investment as
part of his Make-in-India campaign to turn India into a manufacturing
hub and deliver jobs to the millions of youth entering the workforce.
Trump, for his part, has pushed for U.S. manufacturing to return home as
part of his Make America Great Again campaign.
The trigger for the latest downturn in trade ties was India’s new rules
on e-commerce that restrict the way Amazon.com Inc and Walmart-backed
Flipkart do business in a rapidly growing online market set to touch
$200 billion by 2027.
That, coming on top of a drive to force global card payments companies
such as Mastercard and Visa to move their data to India and the
imposition of higher tariffs on electronic products and smartphones,
left a broader trade package the two sides were working on through last
year in tatters.
The GSP was tied to the trade package and since that deal had slipped
further away, the United States was considering withdrawing or scaling
back the preferential arrangement, people familiar with the matter said.
The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) was completing a review of India’s
status as a GSP beneficiary and an announcement was expected over the
next two weeks, they said.
"(The two sides) were trying to sort out the trade package, but were not
able to actually finish the deal. In the meantime these other things,
data localization and e-commerce, have come along," one of them said.
"In a sense its like someone has rained on the parade."
India and the United States have developed close political and security
ties. But bilateral trade, which stood at $126 billion in 2017, is
widely seen to be performing at nearly a quarter of its potential.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross is due in New Delhi next week where
he is expected to raise concerns about the e-commerce policy and data
localization, officials said.
VARIOUS NEW POLICIES
New Indian rules announced in December for the e-commerce sector banned
companies such as Amazon and Flipkart from striking exclusive deals with
sellers, restricted their ability to offer discounts and barred them
from selling products via vendors in which they have an equity interest.
The move disrupted product listings on Amazon's India website and forced
it to change its business structures. Amazon and Walmart, as well as the
U.S. government, had lobbied against the move, Reuters reported earlier.
[to top of second column] |
U.S. President Donald
Trump holds a bilateral meeting with India's Prime Minister Narendra
Modi alongside the ASEAN Summit in Manila, Philippines November 13,
2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
The new rules, coming ahead of a general election, were seen as a bid by Modi to
placate small traders, who had for years complained about business practices of
large e-commerce players.
They form a key voter base for Modi who is facing a tightening election in the
next few months.
The idea of the policy was to foster healthy competition and promote India’s
e-commerce, an Indian government official involved in trade issues said,
defending the curbs on the big firms.
But companies disagree and decry such sudden policy changes.
"These types of actions can really put a negative view on India as an investment
destination," one of the sources said.
India last year also announced proposals to force foreign companies to store
more of their user data locally, in a bid to better conduct legal
investigations. U.S. lobby groups had voiced concerns about those proposals too,
saying they made it difficult for companies to do business in the country.
POSSIBLE INDIA SETBACK
If the United States eliminates duty-free access for about 2,000 Indian product
lines, it will mostly hurt small businesses such as jewelry, said one of the
sources. The number of goods qualifying for preferential treatment could be
reduced, or the whole program could be withdrawn.
There was no response to a request for comment from the USTR or the U.S.
Embassy. India's trade ministry also did not answer questions emailed to them
about trade differences with the United States.
But an Indian government official briefed on the trade discussions said the
trade package under which the two sides were negotiating better access to each
other's farm and dairy markets was unlikely until the elections in India this
spring.
Talks on U.S. demands to relax India's decision to cap prices of medical devices
made in the United States had also got stuck, the official said.
"The list of grievances is getting bigger, now with e-commerce added in," he
said.
India fears Trump may demand a free trade agreement if both sides fail to reach
a compromise on the trade package. Such a pact would mean zero tariffs for U.S.
goods arriving in India, further threatening local industry.
(Additional reporting by Aditya Kalra; Editing by Nick Macfie)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |