Shell leads cash race but Exxon catching up
Send a link to a friend
[February 08, 2019]
By Ron Bousso
LONDON (Reuters) - Royal Dutch Shell
widened its lead over Exxon Mobil as king of cash among the world's top
oil and gas companies last year but its U.S. rival could catch up with
its investment drive in new production.
The five leading firms, known as oil majors, more than tripled profits
and doubled cash generation since 2016 as deep cost cutting bore fruit
after an industry slump.
Unlike previous cycles, most executives have promised in the past week
to stay thrifty, with memories of the 2016 oil price plunge below $30 a
barrel still fresh and the outlook remaining foggy.
(Graphic: Kings of cash - https://tmsnrt.rs/2TF9NMu)
For investors, it's been a bumpy ride.
In the past five years, oil majors broadly underperformed global stock
markets. A sharp drop in crude prices in the last quarter of 2018 to
below $50 a barrel from a four-year high of $86 a barrel in October was
a bleak reminder of the uncertainty.
But stronger than expected results in the fourth quarter of 2018
reported over the past week gave the sector a boost as companies
surprised investors with their resilience to generate profit, or
breakeven, at oil prices around $50 a barrel.
A barrel of benchmark Brent is now trading around $60. [O/R]
"The cyclical driver is higher oil prices and strong refining margins
but underlying this is a structural move to lower breakevens which is
driving higher cash flows," said Rohan Murphy, energy equity analyst at
Allianz Global Investors.
"I think the companies will remain disciplined," he said. "When I meet
the managements of these companies they are enthused about the future
rather than feeling constrained."
After Exxon and Shell, the other three majors are U.S. firm Chevron,
Britain's BP and France's Total.
(Graphic: Oil profits - https://tmsnrt.rs/2UO61Rj)
(Graphic: Flowing Cash - https://tmsnrt.rs/2UNIwYG)
CATCH UP
Exxon is the outlier of the group for now, as it boosts its spending to
develop large-scale projects in Guyana and Mozambique and its sprawling
U.S. onshore shale portfolio.
The company, still the biggest energy firm in terms of production and
market size, was slow to respond to the drop in crude prices, lagging
rivals when they slashed costs, sacked employees and sold assets in the
past three years.
But under Chief Executive Darren Woods, who succeeded Rex Tillerson when
he became U.S. secretary of state from 2017 until last year, Exxon is
undergoing profound changes in its operations and structure in an effort
to catch up.
[to top of second column] |
: A rainbow is seen over a pumpjack during sunset outside
Scheibenhard, near Strasbourg, France, October 6, 2017.
REUTERS/Christian Hartmann/File Photo
(Graphic: Exxon vs. Shell: A tight race for production - https://tmsnrt.rs/2UPYsJU)
Exxon will increase capital spending to $30 billion this year from $26 billion
in 2018.
It is also trying to sell large assets in Azerbaijan and Tanzania.
Woods told analysts in a fourth quarter earnings call that the Irving,
Texas-based company would accelerate divestments.
"Exxon Mobil has pulled the divestiture value creation lever much less than
peers over five and 10 years," said Doug Terreson, analyst at Evercore ISI. "It
is timely for them to divest and use proceeds to reinvest in higher quality
areas."
Exxon has pledged to double earnings and cash flow from operations by 2025.
Anglo-Dutch Shell is still set to retain the crown for cash generation until the
end of the decade thanks to rising production and its dominance in liquefied
natural gas (LNG).
But Exxon's new production should sharply narrow the gap, according to estimates
by HSBC, which has a 'hold' rating on Shell and 'buy' on Exxon.
While Exxon invests heavily into future production, Shell's output growth is set
to slow after years of gains following the acquisition of rival BG Group in
2016.
For Shell and other rivals which have held back on new investments, the race to
find new reserves to replace depleting fields will be a key challenge, said
Darren Sissons, portfolio manager at Canadian investment management firm
Campbell, Lee & Ross.
"The trade off of balance sheet and reduced exploration and production (E&P) and
capital expenditure has worked to strengthen balance sheets with the cost being
reserve life deterioration," Sissons said.
"The next wave of E&P was largely started tepidly last year by Exxon and BP but
all the others have now joined in."
(Additional reporting by Gary McWilliams in Houston; Editing by Edmund Blair)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |