| 
		North Korea may have made more nuclear 
		bombs, but threat reduced: study 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [February 12, 2019] 
		By David Brunnstrom 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - North Korea has 
		continued to produce bomb fuel while in denuclearization talks with the 
		United States and may have produced enough in the past year to add as 
		many as seven nuclear weapons to its arsenal, according to a study 
		released just weeks before a planned second summit between the North 
		Korean leader and U.S. President Donald Trump.
 
 However, the country's freeze in nuclear and missile testing since 2017 
		mean that North Korea's weapons program probably poses less of a threat 
		than it did at the end of that year, the report by Stanford University's 
		Center for International Security and Cooperation found.
 
 Siegfried Hecker, a former director of the U.S. Los Alamos weapons 
		laboratory in New Mexico who is now at Stanford and was one of the 
		report's authors, told Reuters analysis of satellite imagery showed 
		North Korea's production of bomb fuel continued in 2018.
 
		
		 
		
 He said spent fuel generated from operation of the 5 megawatt reactor at 
		its main nuclear plant at Yongbyon from 2016-18 appeared to have been 
		reprocessed starting in May and would have produced an estimated 5-8 kg 
		of weapons-grade plutonium.
 
 This combined with production of perhaps 150 kg of highly enriched 
		uranium may have allowed North Korea to increase the number of weapons 
		in its arsenal by between five and seven, the Stanford report said.
 
 Hecker's team had estimated the size of North Korea's arsenal in 2017 at 
		30, bringing a possible current total of 37 weapons. U.S. intelligence 
		is not certain how many nuclear warheads North Korea has. Last year, the 
		Defense Intelligence Agency was at the high end with an estimate of 
		about 50 nuclear warheads, while analysts have given a range of 20-60.
 
 The Stanford report said that while North Korea was likely to have 
		continued work on warhead miniaturization and to ensure they can stand 
		up to delivery via intercontinental ballistic missiles, the halt in 
		testing greatly limited its ability to make such improvements.
 
 "They have continued the machinery to turn out plutonium and highly 
		enriched uranium," Hecker said, "but it also depends on weaponization - 
		the design, build and test and then the delivery.
 
 "When they ended missile testing, those things rolled backwards. So when 
		I look at the whole spectrum, to me North Korea ... is less dangerous 
		today than it was at the end of 2017, in spite of the fact that they may 
		have made another five to seven weapons worth of nuclear material."
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			People carry flags in front of statues of North Korea founder Kim Il 
			Sung (L) and late leader Kim Jong Il during a military parade 
			marking the 70th anniversary of North Korea's foundation in 
			Pyongyang, North Korea, September 9, 2018. REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui 
            
 
            The Stanford experts said it was their assessment that "North Korea 
			cannot deliver a nuclear warhead with any measure of confidence to 
			the U.S. mainland," although Hecker said its nuclear weapons were a 
			real threat to Japan and South Korea.
 Hecker said it was understandable that North Korea should have 
			continued its weapons work, given that it had reached no specific 
			agreement in the latest talks with the United States to stop that 
			work.
 
 U.S. Secretary State Mike Pompeo told Congress in July that North 
			Korea was continuing to produce fuel for nuclear bombs in spite of 
			its pledge to denuclearize, even as he argued - as he has continued 
			to do - that the Trump administration was making progress in talks 
			with Pyongyang.
 
 North Korean leader Kim Jong Un pledged during an unprecedented 
			first summit with Trump last June to work towards denuclearization 
			of the Korean peninsula.
 
 There has been little concrete progress since, but in September, Kim 
			expressed willingness to take steps, including the permanent 
			dismantlement of nuclear facilities at Yongbyon, in return for 
			"corresponding measures" by the United States.
 
 U.S. Special Representative for North Korea Stephen Biegun held 
			three days of talks in Pyongyang last week to prepare for a second 
			Trump-Kim summit due to be held in Hanoi on Feb. 27 and 28. He said 
			before the talks they would include discussion of corresponding 
			steps North Korea has demanded.
 
            
			 
			Trump described those talks as "very productive" but the State 
			Department has offered no sign of progress and Biegun and his 
			counterpart have agreed to meet again before the summit.
 (Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |