Philadelphia beats U.S. appeal in
sanctuary city case
Send a link to a friend
[February 16, 2019]
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - A federal appeals court said on
Friday the Trump administration cannot cut off grants to Philadelphia
for its refusal to cooperate with immigration authorities seeking to
deport immigrants who are in the country illegally.
In a 3-0 decision, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia
said the U.S. attorney general lacked power to condition that city's
receipt of $1.6 million for local law enforcement on its compliance with
three new requirements.
These included alerting Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials
when undocumented immigrants are being released from prison, providing
access to interview immigrants, and barring the withholding of
immigrants' citizenship status.
Several other "sanctuary cities" have also opposed to the requirements,
and Chicago, New York and San Francisco have won court rulings blocking
their enforcement.
In Friday's decision, Circuit Judge Marjorie Rendell said the attorney
general has only limited oversight of the program for awarding the Byrne
Justice Assistance Grants.
"Allowing the attorney general to withhold all funds because a
jurisdiction does not certify compliance with any federal law of the
attorney general's choosing undermines the predictability and
consistency embedded in the program's design," Rendell wrote.
The U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately respond to requests
for comment.
Friday's decision largely upheld a June 2018 ruling by U.S. District
Judge Michael Baylson in Philadelphia, but voided his requirement that
the government obtain warrants before seeking custody of immigrants in
city custody.
[to top of second column]
|
A demonstrator holds a sign to protest against U.S President Donald
Trump's executive order banning refugees and immigrants from seven
primarily Muslim countries from entering the United States during a
rally in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S. February 4, 2017
REUTERS/Tom Mihalek
It was issued a couple of hours before President Donald Trump
declared a national emergency to fund a wall at the U.S.-Mexico
border without congressional approval. Democrats vowed to challenge
his action as unconstitutional.
Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney praised the appeals court decision, in
a statement referring to Trump's declaration.
"The conditions imposed by the DOJ were an unconscionable attempt to
bully the city and its residents into changing our policies," Kenney
said. "On the very day the president declared a bogus national
emergency to build a useless wall, I say to our immigrant community:
we are glad you call Philadelphia home."
The case is Philadelphia v. Attorney General of the United States,
3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 18-2648.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York, editing by G Crosse)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|