Qualcomm urges U.S. regulators to reverse course and ban
some iPhones
Send a link to a friend
[February 20, 2019]
By Stephen Nellis
(Reuters) - Qualcomm Inc is urging U.S.
trade regulators to reverse a judge's ruling and ban the import of some
Apple Inc iPhones in a long-running patent fight between the two
companies.
Qualcomm is seeking the ban in hopes of dealing Apple a blow before the
two begin a major trial in mid-April in San Diego over Qualcomm's patent
licensing practices. Qualcomm has sought to apply pressure to Apple with
smaller legal challenges ahead of that trial and has won partial iPhone
sales bans in China and Germany against Apple, forcing the iPhone maker
to ship only phones with Qualcomm chips to some markets.
Any possible ban on iPhone imports to the United States could be
short-lived because Apple last week for the first time disclosed that it
has found a software fix to avoid infringing on one of Qualcomm's
patents. Apple asked regulators to give it as much as six months to
prove that the fix works.
Qualcomm brought a case against Apple at the U.S International Trade
Commission in 2017 alleging that some iPhones violated Qualcomm patents
to help smart phones run well without draining their batteries. Qualcomm
asked for an import ban on some older iPhone models containing Intel
Corp chips.
In September, Thomas Pender, an administrative law judge at the ITC,
found that Apple violated one of the patents in the case but declined to
issue a ban. Pender reasoned that imposing a ban on Intel-chipped
iPhones would hand Qualcomm an effective monopoly on the U.S. market for
modem chips, which connect smart phones to wireless data networks.
Pender's ruling said that preserving competition in the modem chip
market was in the public interest as speedier 5G networks come online in
the next few years.
[to top of second column] |
A Qualcomm sign is seen during the China International Import Expo (CIIE),
at the National Exhibition and Convention Center in Shanghai, China
November 6, 2018. REUTERS/Aly Song/File Photo
Cases where the ITC finds patent violations but does not ban the import of
products are rare. In December, the full ITC said it would review Pender's
decision and decide whether to uphold or reverse it by late March.
In filings that became public late last week ahead of the full commission's
decision, Apple for the first time said that it had developed a software fix to
avoid running afoul of Qualcomm's patent. Apple said it did not discover the fix
until after the trial and that it implemented the new software "last fall."
But Apple said that it would need six months to verify that the fix will satisfy
regulators and to sell its existing inventory. Apple asked the full commission
to delay any possible import ban by that long if the commission reverses the
judge's decisions.
In a filing late on Friday, Qualcomm argued that Apple's disclosure of a fix
undermined the reasoning in Pender's decision and that the Intel-chipped phones
should be banned while Apple deploys its fix.
"Pender recommended against a remedy on the assumption that the (Qualcomm)
patent would preclude Apple from using Intel as a supplier for many years and
that no redesign was feasible," Qualcomm wrote. "Apple now admits—more than
seven months after the hearing—that the alleged harm is entirely avoidable."
(Reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |