No gas? No votes. Subsidy cuts imperil Ukraine leader's
reelection bid
Send a link to a friend
[February 28, 2019]
By Natalia Zinets and Matthias Williams
SKRYHALIVKA, Ukraine (Reuters) - Ukrainian
pensioner Nadiya Ignatiy says she has had the plum and cherry trees in
her garden cut down for firewood since the government raised gas prices
late last year.
In next month's election, she will vote against President Petro
Poroshenko in favour of an opponent who has pledged to restore the gas
subsidies that were scaled back to secure an international bailout.
"We cleared the garden," she said in her house in the village of
Skryhalivka, 80 km (50 miles) southwest of Kiev. "Not just me, other
people are doing it now... previously you could heat with gas but now
it's a problem."
Such frustrations could tip the balance in the March 31 election against
Poroshenko, whose market-oriented reforms have helped stabilise a
country battling Russian-backed separatism and encouraged Western
investors wary of pervasive corruption.
(Graphic: Ukraine presidential election -
https://tmsnrt.rs/2EEQ22R)
Poroshenko was elected in 2014 after protests ousted a Kremlin-friendly
president and sent the government and the West on a collision course
with Russia: Russia annexed Crimea and supported the overthrow of
government rule in eastern Ukraine.
An influential businessman who had made a fortune from confectionery, he
pledged to take the ex-Soviet country out of Russia's orbit and restore
control over the east in a matter of weeks. The latter has not happened,
but he has overseen an uneasy stalemate with separatist-held regions and
ended a steep recession, with around 3.4 percent growth last year.
Living standards, however, have continued to decline. The average
monthly wage has dropped the equivalent of almost $80 since 2013 and
Ukrainians need more than three times as many local hryvnia to buy a
dollar as they did then.
Inflation peaked at 43 percent in 2015 and the price of a cubic meter of
gas is almost 12 times what it was in 2013.
Since the revolution, "nothing has changed substantially for the
better," said Nadiya Yurchenko, 79, who hoped for a higher pension,
heating allowance and better healthcare as well as peace with Russia
when she voted for Poroshenko in 2014.
Poroshenko won the first round outright in 2014, but many polls have
shown the election frontrunner this time to be Yulia Tymoshenko, a
former prime minister and fiery campaigner who compares the gas price
rise to "genocide".
Another candidate who has surged in February is comic actor Volodymyr
Zelenskiy, a political novice and largely an unknown quantity.
"For the IMF and most of Ukraine's western partners, Poroshenko is a
lesser evil, he is an acceptable partner," said analyst Volodymyr
Fesenko.
However, "with their requirement for raising the price of gas and
utility tariffs, the IMF paradoxically ends up giving political help to
those whom it fears", he said.
CORRUPTION ISSUE
Subsidised gas for households is a source of corruption in Ukraine
because businesses divert it for their own use to avoid paying market
prices, draining money from the state budget.
The IMF, which has lent $14.7 billion to Ukraine since April 2014, has
made gradually bringing household tariffs in line with market prices a
condition for more funding. When gas prices were hiked in November,
Poroshenko said there had been no choice.
"The government was caught between the bad and the very bad, between
tariff increases and a blow to macroeconomic stability."
IMF country head Gosta Ljungman has said price controls were ineffective
at providing social protection, and led to overconsumption and
corruption, while liberalising the market meant richer households paid
more, freeing cash for poorer ones.
"The most optimal approach is to give markets the right to determine the
price, and then to provide well-focused subsidies to those who need them
most," Ljungman told Ukrainian news site FinClub this month in comments
his office referred Reuters to.
[to top of second column] |
Pensioner Nadiya Ignatiy, 60, carries firewood near her house in the
village of Skryhalivka, Kiev region, Ukraine February 11, 2019.
REUTERS/Gleb Garanich
Government officials were not immediately available to comment on why some of
the poorest Ukrainian households were not getting help to adjust to the new
prices.
Price rises are among voters' main concerns and gas prices came out top in an
opinion poll by the Kiev International Institute of Sociology in October and
early November, when Poroshenko slipped from second into third place behind
Tymoshenko and Zelenskiy.
Poroshenko moved back to second place after Ukraine's Orthodox Church won
independence from the Russian Church in January and the government plans pension
increases on Friday that his opponents say are designed to bolster his ratings.
But Fesenko said any gains may be offset by the arrival this month of the first
higher gas bills and then those for other utilities.
Tymoshenko and other candidates like Yuriy Boyko, a former energy minister
popular mainly in Ukraine's Russian-speaking east, have used rising prices to
attack the president.
Tempers flared at a lawmakers' meeting on Monday when Tymoshenko accused
Poroshenko and his associates of funnelling money gained from the price rises to
offshore bank accounts, an allegation swiftly denied by the leader of
Poroshenko's faction.
After a Feb. 16 meeting with Tymoshenko, IMF chief Christine Lagarde stressed
the urgency for Ukraine to continue reforms and safeguard its return to economic
stability.
Tymoshenko says she wants to keep cooperation with the IMF but change the terms
of the deal. She has also promised sharp hikes in salaries and pensions and to
change central bank policy to provide cheap loans to small businesses.
How she would act on those promises if she wins is unclear, but it is enough to
make many investors uncomfortable.
Poroshenko helped build foreign direct investment back up to $4.4 billion in
2016, but it fell to $1.87 billion in 2017 amid concern about Ukraine's
finances, far off the $5.46 billion under former president Victor Yanukovich.
"The threat that cooperation with the IMF will be disrupted, and the threat that
the country will again return to the prospect of default, is much higher if
other candidates win," said Serhiy Fursa, a Kiev-based investment banker at
Dragon Capital.
Shoring up state finances means little to voters left out of pocket. Liubov
Spychak, 73-year pensioner from the town of Cherkasy, fought back tears as she
described how expensive it had become to heat her two-bedroom apartment.
In December almost four-fifths of her pension went on utilities, she said by
telephone: "I am very ill after working my whole life for a chemical plant. I
can hardly walk and they rejected my application for subsidies."
In Skryhalivka, in the Fastiv district where Poroshenko got around 65 percent of
votes in 2014, villagers said many people were struggling.
With snow thick on the ground on a February afternoon and the thermometer on her
living room table showing 5 degrees Celsius, Yurchenko said her pension after a
45-year career as a teacher and school principal did not go far enough.
She has a 2015 calendar with Tymoshenko's face hanging on a bookshelf next to
volumes of Fyodor Dostoevsky and James Joyce, but will vote for Boyko, as will
her 60-year-old neighbour Ignatiy whose fruit trees went to feed her stove.
Yurchenko estimates she would need to spend nearly four months' worth of pension
income to heat her home properly through the winter.
Ignatiy said gas, electricity and groceries were all getting more expensive.
"Everything's going up except for salaries and pensions."
(Editing by Philippa Fletcher)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |