Researchers think skipping screenings may be a marker for more
generally neglecting one's own health.
"It was not a direct effect of missing the cancer screening that led
to the increased mortality in the non-compliers," said study
co-author Dr. Paul Pinsky of the National Cancer Institute in
Bethesda, Maryland.
"Rather, we believe that non-compliance with the screening was a
marker of a wider health behavioral profile of general
non-compliance with or non-adherence to medical tests and
treatments," Pinsky said by email. "Non-compliance with medical
procedures has also been linked, in this and other studies, to other
unhealthy lifestyle factors such as obesity and smoking, and to
lower education."
The researchers examined data on 64,567 adults (age 62, on average)
who were told to get screened for lung and colorectal cancers. Men
were also advised to get tested for prostate tumors and women were
asked to get checked for ovarian cancer.
Overall, 55,065 participants, or about 85 percent, did what they
were told and 6,954, or about 11 percent, didn't.
Within 10 years, people who didn't get any of their recommended
cancer screenings were 73 percent more likely to die of causes other
than the tumors targeted by the tests than participants who got all
of their screenings, the study found.
Some screening was better than none at all, the researchers also
found.
About 2,500 participants, or 4 percent, were partially compliant
with screening recommendations, getting some but not all of what was
recommended based on their sex and age. These individuals were 36
percent more likely to die of causes other than cancer during the
study than their counterparts who received all recommended
screenings.
[to top of second column] |
Even after researchers accounted for other factors that can hasten
death like smoking, obesity and multiple chronic medical issues,
compliance with cancer screenings still mattered: people who didn't
get any screenings were 46 percent more likely to die of other
causes during the study and people who skipped some screenings were
26 percent more likely to die.
One limitation of the study is that researchers were missing more
data for people who skipped screenings than for people who got
recommended cancer tests, the authors note in JAMA Internal
Medicine.
Because all of the people in the study knew they would be asked to
get multiple screenings, it's also possible that their results don't
reflect what might happen in the broader population.
Even so, the results suggest that the same factors that motivate
screening decisions might also impact other aspects of health, said
Dr. Deborah Grady of the University of California, San Francisco,
who co-wrote an accompanying editorial.
"There is no way that getting screened for cancer can reduce the
risk of dying of causes totally unrelated to screening," Grady said
by email.
"What probably accounts for this association is the fact that people
who follow advice to undergo screening have a lot of other
health-related behaviors," Grady added. "It's likely that it's these
sorts of behaviors that reduce the risk of dying."
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2TmsZhu and https://bit.ly/2F3ca8b JAMA
Internal Medicine, online December 28, 2018.
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |