Annual health care marketing surged from $17.7 billion in 1997 to at
least $29.9 billion in 2016, driven by a rapid spike in spending on
direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements for prescription drugs, the
study found. Over this period, DTC spending climbed from $2.1
billion to $9.6 billion.
Pharmaceutical marketing to health professionals accounted for the
biggest outlay, and climbed from $15.6 billion to $20.3 billion
despite new policies at hospitals and medical schools designed to
limit industry influence over prescribing.
"While marketing may have positive effects like destigmatizing
diseases (e.g., HIV) or embarrassing symptoms (e.g., impotence) it
can also expand or even create disease or raise false hopes by
exaggerating treatment effects - for example marketing of marginally
effective Alzheimer's drugs," said study coauthor Dr. Steven
Woloshin of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical
Practice in Lebanon, New Hampshire.
"This can lead to overdiagnosis, overtreatment (with associated
harms) and wasted resources," Woloshin said by email.
To compete for market share, just about every player in the industry
from drugmakers to insurers to hospitals to diagnostic test makers
invest in marketing to insiders who make prescribing and purchasing
decisions as well as to consumers.
Health spending in the U.S. is the highest in the world, totaling
$3.3 trillion in 2016, or 17.8 percent of the gross domestic
product, researchers report in JAMA.
The industry marketing outlays in the current study match the
roughly $30 billion budget of the National Institutes of Health and
far outstrip the budget of about $5 billion for the agency in charge
of policing the industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), Woloshin noted.
The study focused on marketing of prescription drugs, disease
awareness campaigns, health services, and laboratory tests to
consumers and professionals. It underestimates total spending
because researchers lacked data on so-called detailing, or sales
calls to clinicians, coupons or rebates, online promotions, and
spending on medical meetings and other events, the authors note.
[to top of second column] |
Industry marketing budgets also include numerous other outlays that
weren't counted in the study, like the cost of training and salaries
for sales reps, marketing research, fees paid to advertising
agencies and lobbying campaigns, the authors also point out.
Still, it is the most comprehensive analysis of medical marketing in
the U.S. that has ever been done, said Dr. Howard Bauchner,
editor-in-chief of JAMA.
"For clinicians, policy makers, and patients it is important for
them to be aware of the extent of medical marketing," Bauchner said
by email.
"Since DTC advertising is legal in the U.S. it is important for
patients to discuss anything that they read, see (TV ads) or hear
with their clinician," added Bauchner, coauthor of an editorial
accompanying the study. "It is difficult in adverts to present a
complete analysis of risk and benefit of any drug, device, or test."
Even with the rise of marketing and consumerism, physicians still
make the bulk of decisions, and it's not surprising that the
industry devotes most of its marketing funds to reaching
professionals, said Meredith Rosenthal of the Harvard T.H. Chan
School of Public Health in Boston, who coauthored an accompanying
editorial.
"Marketing can cause doctors to switch to slightly better (and
sometimes not even) better new products that cost substantially
more," Rosenthal said by email.
And marketing can be a mixed bag for patients.
"DTC for health services might also encourage consumers to get
services they don't need - tests in particular, and these can have
negative consequences (false positives, worry about small risks),"
Rosenthal added. "On the benefit side, some DTC advertisements help
de-stigmatize conditions like sexually transmitted infections or
depression and encourage people to seek care."
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2TCQsen JAMA, online January 8, 2018.
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |