Exclusive: U.S. demands regular review of China trade
reform
Send a link to a friend
[January 19, 2019]
By Michael Martina and Chris Prentice
BEIJING/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United
States is pushing for regular reviews of China's progress on pledged
trade reforms as a condition for a trade deal - and could again resort
to tariffs if it deems Beijing has violated the agreement, according to
sources briefed on negotiations to end the trade war between the two
nations.
A continuing threat of tariffs hanging over commerce between the world's
two largest economies would mean a deal would not end the risk of
investing in businesses or assets that have been impacted by the trade
war.
"The threat of tariffs is not going away, even if there is a deal," said
one of three sources briefed on the talks who spoke with Reuters on
condition of anonymity.
Chinese negotiators were not keen on the idea of regular compliance
checks, the source said, but the U.S. proposal "didn't derail
negotiations."
A Chinese source said the United States wants “periodic assessments” but
it's not yet clear how often.
“It looks like humiliation," the source said. "But perhaps the two sides
could find a way to save face for the Chinese government."
The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed import
tariffs on Chinese goods to put pressure on Beijing to meet a long list
of demands that would rewrite the terms of trade between the two
countries.
The demands include changes to China's policies on intellectual property
protection, technology transfers, industrial subsidies and other trade
barriers.
An enforcement and verification process is unusual for trade deals and
is akin to the process around punitive economic sanctions such as those
imposed on North Korea and Iran.
Disputes over trade are more typically dealt with through courts, the
World Trade Organization (WTO) or through arbitration panels and other
dispute settlement mechanisms built into trade agreements.
Trump's team has criticized the WTO for failing to hold China
accountable for not executing on promised market reforms. The U.S. has
also criticized the WTO's dispute settlement process and is seeking
reforms at the organization.
Regular reviews would be one potential solution to address a demand from
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer for ongoing verification of
any trade pact between the two countries, three sources familiar with
the talks told Reuters. The threat of tariffs would be used to keep
reform on track, the sources said.
Lighthizer is leading negotiations with China. A USTR spokesman declined
to comment on the possibility of regular assessments.
The idea of quarterly reviews of quarterly reviews was part of a U.S.
negotiating document leaked after talks in May 2018, before the United
States had slapped its first round of duties on $50 billion worth of
Chinese goods.
[to top of second column] |
President Donald Trump, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, U.S.
President Donald Trump's national security adviser John Bolton and
Chinese President Xi Jinping attend a working dinner after the G20
leaders summit in Buenos Aires, Argentina December 1, 2018.
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
The renewed focus on regular reviews in current negotiations - this time
carrying the threat of tariffs - underscores the growing distrust between the
two countries.
The extra scrutiny is needed and should be based on clear benchmarks - with
consequence for failing to meet them, said Erin Ennis, Senior Vice President of
the U.S.-China Business Council, a trade group representing American companies
doing business in China.
“It needs to be tied to removing or reducing the tariffs," Ennis said. "If China
can show compliance through a process like this, it would also be a
trust-building measure for both sides.”
BROKEN PROMISES
Trump's administration has accused China of repeatedly failing to follow through
on previous pledges to implement reforms sought by the United States.
Washington often cites as an example the difficulties still faced by foreign
payment card operators in entering China's market despite a 2012 WTO ruling that
Beijing was discriminating against them.
A separate industry source said it is likely that different agreement on
separate issues - forced technology transfer, intellectual property, changes to
China's legal system - would require separate verification processes, all of
which will need to be hammered out by negotiators.
"The challenge of verification and enforcement stems from the fact that China
has made promises it hasn't kept," the source said.
Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to a 90-day truce in the trade war
in December to give their teams time to negotiate a deal. Nearly 50 days later,
there is little sign that China will make the concessions the U.S. is seeking.
Lighthizer saw no progress on structural issues at three days of mid-level talks
in Beijing last week, Republican Senator Chuck Grassley said on Tuesday.
China's Vice Premier and lead negotiator Liu He is due to visit Washington for
the next round of talks with Lighthizer and U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven
Mnuchin at the end of the month.
(Reporting by Michael Martina in Beijing and Chris Prentice in Washington;
Additional reporting by David Lawder in Washington; Editing by Simon Webb and
Brian Thevenot)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |