| 
		Supreme Court scraps arguments on Trump 
		census appeal 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [January 19, 2019] 
		By Lawrence Hurley 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme 
		Court on Friday canceled arguments that had been scheduled for next 
		month in an appeal by President Donald Trump's administration relating 
		to its contentious move to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. 
		census.
 
 The administration had challenged the scope of evidence that U.S. 
		District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan could use in considering his 
		decision in a lawsuit filed by 18 U.S. states, 15 cities and various 
		civil rights groups challenging the legality of the citizenship 
		question.
 
 The justices disclosed the cancellation of the Feb. 19 arguments in a 
		notation on the court docket a day after the challengers, including New 
		York state, filed court papers calling the administration's appeal moot 
		because Furman issued his final decision this week invalidating the 
		census question.
 
 Furman on Tuesday found that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who 
		oversees the census, concealed the true motives for his "arbitrary and 
		capricious" decision to add the question in violation of federal law. 
		The Justice Department on Thursday said it would appeal Furman's ruling 
		and it could seek to fast-track the case to the high court.
 
 Opponents have accused the Trump administration of devising a 
		citizenship question to use the census to pursue the political 
		objectives of Trump's fellow Republicans by engineering an undercount of 
		the true population and reducing the electoral representation of 
		Democratic-leaning communities in Congress.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			The U.S. Supreme Court building in seen in Washington, U.S., 
			November 13, 2018. REUTERS/Al Drago/File Photo 
            
 
            The challengers in the case said a citizenship question would 
			frighten immigrants and Latinos into abstaining from the count. 
			Trump has taken a hard line toward legal and illegal immigrants.
 Ross has said the citizenship question was needed to provide data to 
			better enforce the Voting Rights Act, which protects eligible voters 
			from discrimination. Only American citizens can vote in federal 
			elections.
 
            
			 
            
 (Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |