China readies first perpetual bond issue by bank, but
demand could be weak
Send a link to a friend
[January 21, 2019]
By Shu Zhang and Samuel Shen
SINGAPORE/SHANGHAI (Reuters) - China took a big step last week on the
long road toward recapitalization of banks hobbled by stale loans,
giving a first ever approval for a perpetual bond issue by a lender, but
going by initial feedback "perps" could be difficult to sell.
The role of pathbreaker has fallen to Bank of China (BoC) <601988.SS>
<3988.HK>, the country's fourth-largest lender. Last Thursday, the
banking and insurance regulator gave BoC clearance to issue up to 40
billion yuan ($5.9 billion) of non-fixed term bonds.
How it fares will be scrutinized by every other bank in China.
Alarmed by a slowing economy, policymakers are in a hurry to have banks
fit enough to ramp up credit expansion, but banks' lending capacity is
largely limited by their capital adequacy.
Most Chinese lenders have relatively thin Additional Tier 1 (AT1)
capital, and before approval was given for perps the only way that banks
could raise AT1 capital was through the issuance of preference shares.
But with many listed banks now trading below their book values in a weak
stock market, lenders find it challenging to sell additional shares and
are increasingly looking to the onshore bond market to take advantage of
current low yields.
CIB Research, a unit of Industrial Bank <601166.SS>, estimated Chinese
lenders need to raise 470 billion yuan ($69.24 billion) this year
through perps and preference shares to cover a shortfall in Additional
Tier 1 capital.
Investors would need a higher yield to compensate them for the higher
risk, as perp holders have less claim than normal debt holders, and only
slightly more claim than equity holders.
"Theoretically the risks of holding them are very high and the returns
are limited," said Gu Weiyong, chief investment officer of UCON
Investments, a private fund. "There are better investment options than
that."
BoC declined to comment on its perp plans, and hasn't indicated what
yield it would offer.
CIB estimated perpetual bonds could be priced 150 bps higher than Tier-2
capital instruments issued by the same bank, or around 7 percent for a
mid-sized bank.
Three sources, including a banker and two institutional investor
executives, told Reuters that BoC had already sounded out potential
investors to gauge demand and possible pricing.
BoC is planning to issue the perpetual bonds by the end of January, one
of the sources said, and they are likely be priced within the range of
4.5 percent to 5.2 percent.
"The yield isn't high enough to attract us," said the source who works
at the asset management unit of a state insurer and attended the bank's
roadshow.
Executives at a number of institutions said the investor base for the
BoC issue could be limited, though the government could easily push
state-owned funds and insurers to buy a large chunk of the debt.
Some fund and wealth managers say they are not attracted by perps, and
it was also unclear whether regulators will loosen current restrictions
that prevent insurance companies from purchasing capital instruments
with unfavorable write-off provisions, like perps.
[to top of second column] |
Pedestrians are seen behind the logo of Bank of China on its ATM in
Beijing, China, March 28, 2016. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon/File Photo
GREATER INVESTOR SCRUTINY
Though perps are widely used globally, China's banks could face greater
cautiousness from investors, given an industry-wide acceleration of bad loan
build-up following a credit boom since the global financial crisis in 2008.
Aside from the absence of a maturity date, which theoretically means issuers
would never have to pay back the principal, and the disadvantageous write-off
provisions, the structure of perps also exposes holders to high price
fluctuations and unstable coupon payments.
"If a bank issuer gets into real trouble, the chance for bondholders to recover
their investment is pretty low as banks are leveraged," said Ray Heung, a Hong
Kong-based analyst at Moody's Investors Service.
Chinese banks' non-performing loan ratio, at 1.89 percent, is the highest since
the global financial crisis, according to official data, but some analysts
believe the ratio could be much higher as many banks are slow to recognize loans
overdue or hide them in the "special mention loan" category.
The current 0.77 price-to-book ratio for listed banks implies a bad loan ratio
of 12 percent, according to Chuancai Securities.
The International Monetary Fund has been urging Chinese banks to gradually
increase capital to cushion them against a sudden cyclical economic downturn - a
risk that loomed larger after data on Monday showed that during the fourth
quarter of 2018 the economy grew at its weakest rate since the global financial
crisis.
Beijing's multi-year campaign to crack down on financial risks and shadow
banking activity has increased the urgency for banks to recapitalize as lenders
now have to bring off-the-balance-sheet loans onto their balance sheets and set
aside more capital buffers to provision against rising bad debt in a slowing
economy.
Last year, Chinese banks announced hundreds of billions of yuan worth of private
and public fundraising plans through the issuance of shares, led by Agricultural
Bank of China's <1288.HK> <601288.SS> 100 billion yuan A-share private
placement, the biggest by a listed Chinese commercial bank.
And in December, the Financial Stability and Development Committee (FSDC), a
top-level government body, declared its hope that banks would start selling
perps "as soon as possible".
The prospectus for the BoC perp, which is not public but has been seen by
Reuters, lists BoC International (China) as the lead underwriter, China
International Capital Corp as the joint lead, and HSBC Bank (China) <HSBA.L> and
Bank of Jiangsu <600919.SS> as members of the underwriter syndicate.
The BoC issue looks set to be the first of many, with Harbin Bank <6138.HK>
already looking to sell up to 15 billion yuan in perpetual bonds.
(Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |