Philippine Senators oppose president's
push to lower criminal age to 9
Send a link to a friend
[January 22, 2019]
MANILA (Reuters) - Senators in the
Philippines on Tuesday joined activists and child protection groups in
condemning a lower house move to reduce the age of criminal liability
from 15 to nine, calling it extreme and unjust.
The proposal has President Rodrigo Duterte's support and is being
revived by his Congressional allies, having been filed on his
inauguration day in 2016 along with a bid to re-introduce the death
penalty - moves touting his crime-busting credentials.
The plan was approved on Monday by the lower house's justice committee,
but still needs several readings before a house vote. It would then
require counterpart legislation and approval of the Senate, members of
which appear less supportive.
"It is anti-family, anti-poor and simply unjust. Moreover, it will
promote a heartless and ruthless society that has no regard for its own
people," said Antonio Trillanes, one of Duterte's biggest critics.
Risa Hontiveros said the idea went against Philippines' international
commitments and a global trend of raising, not lowering, the criminal
age.
"Why do we want to slide back to the minimum, or even below the minimum?
Is this a race to the bottom?" she told a Senate hearing.
Duterte campaigned aggressively on eliminating crime, drugs and
corruption and has said he has since realized they were all on a greater
scale than he had imagined.
Despite a war on drugs that has killed thousands of people and
graft-related scandals and resignations of his own appointees, Duterte
has not lost his luster among Filipinos, who polls show back his
morality-centered approach to law and order.
[to top of second column]
|
President Rodrigo Duterte speaks after his arrival, from a visit in
Israel and Jordan at Davao International airport in Davao City in
southern Philippines, September 8, 2018. REUTERS/Lean Daval Jr.
Senator Panfilo Lacson said nine was too young, but he supported
lowering the age "to a certain level". Joel Villanueva said the bill
needed a rethink, to target parents more.
"Children in general have different levels of maturity and
discernment," he added.
International organizations have expressed alarm, including UNICEF
and Save the Children, while domestic activists said children should
be protected from criminals, not held liable for things they were
forced to do.
Agnes Callamard, a United Nations special rapporteur who has
frequently locked horns with Duterte, called it a "dangerous and
potentially deadly proposal. Just shameful".
Justice committee chairman Salvador Leachon, however, said the bill
was misunderstood, and was rehabilitation-centered, and
"pro-children", with non-compliant parents the ones who would go to
jail.
"The point here is there is no punishment," he told news channel
ANC. "It's rehabilitation, reformative, taking care of the family."
(Reporting by Martin Petty and Karen Lema; Editing by Nick Macfie)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|