U.S. top court rejects
Helsinn over anti-nausea drug patent in win for Teva
Send a link to a friend
[January 23, 2019]
By Andrew Chung
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme
Court on Tuesday refused to revive Swiss drug company Helsinn Healthcare
S.A.'s patent on the lucrative anti-nausea drug Aloxi in a victory for
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, which launched a generic version of it
last year.
|
The nine justices unanimously upheld a lower court ruling that had
canceled Helsinn's patent on Aloxi for violating a provision in U.S.
patent law that forbids sales of an invention before applying for a
patent. Teva began selling its generic version of the drug in March
2018 after convincing the lower court to invalidate the patent.
Aloxi is used to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients receiving
chemotherapy. The high court's decision comes after it previously
refused Helsinn's request to block the lower court ruling while it
considered the company's case, which allowed Israel-based Teva to
bring its Aloxi generic to market.
The ruling could make it easier to cancel key patents, especially
among smaller drugmakers, widening the patent law provision
prohibiting the patenting of an invention if it has been on sale or
offered to the public more than a year before the patent application
was filed.
The dispute centered on a licensing and purchase agreement that
Helsinn, a small, family-owned pharmaceutical company, struck with
another pharmaceutical firm in 2001 to distribute the drug in the
United States and defray its own costs. The deal had been announced
in regulatory filings and a press release.
Teva said the patent was invalid because the deal was reached nearly
two years before Helsinn first applied for a patent and constituted
a public sale. Helsinn, backed by President Donald Trump's
administration, said that the distribution deal did not constitute a
sale to the public because its drug formulation was kept secret.
[to top of second column] |
Helsinn sued in 2011 over Teva's plans for a generic version of
Aloxi. In 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, a
Washington-based specialized patent court, agreed with Teva and
invalidated the patent, finding that a commercial offer or contract
to sell a product makes it available to the public.
Helsinn said the appeals court's decision hindered small companies
that often need partners to develop and bring drugs to the market,
and would dissuade them developing new medicines.
Before Teva's generic was launched, Aloxi accounted for hundreds of
millions of dollars in annual sales for Helsinn, the "overwhelming
majority" of its worldwide revenue, according to court filings.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |