The
ICO proposed a penalty of 183.4 million pounds, or 1.5% of
British Airways' 2017 worldwide turnover, for the hack, which it
said exposed poor security arrangements at the airline.
BA indicated that it planned to appeal against the fine, the
product of European data protection rules, called GDPR, that
came into force in 2018. They allow regulators to fine companies
up to 4% of their global turnover for data-protection failures.
The attack involved traffic to the British Airways website being
diverted to a fraudulent site, where customer details such as
log in, payment card and travel booking details as well as names
and addresses were harvested, the ICO said.
Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham said: "People's
personal data is just that – personal.
"When an organization fails to protect it from loss, damage or
theft it is more than an inconvenience. That's why the law is
clear – when you are entrusted with personal data you must look
after it."
BA's chairman and chief executive Alex Cruz said he was
"surprised and disappointed" by the proposed penalty.
"British Airways responded quickly to a criminal act to steal
customers' data," he said.
"We have found no evidence of fraud/fraudulent activity on
accounts linked to the theft."
Willie Walsh, CEO of parent company IAG, said BA would be making
representations to the ICO about the proposed fine.
"We intend to take all appropriate steps to defend the airline's
position vigorously, including making any necessary appeals," he
said.
Shares in IAG fell 0.8% to 452.7 pence by 0810 GMT.
Analyst Gerald Khoo at broker Liberum said the proposed fine
equated to about 9 pence per IAG share.
"While IAG has more than adequate liquidity to cover the fine
(Dec 2018 cash 3.8 billion euros, total liquidity 6.3 billion
euros), the penalty is still substantial," he said.
The ICO, which could impose fines up to 500,000 under previous
rules, had also investigated BA on behalf of other European
regulators.
The ICO fined Facebook 500,000 pounds in 2018 for serious
breaches of data protection law. It said the penalty would have
"inevitably have been significantly higher under GDPR"
(Reporting by Paul Sandle and James Davey in London and Noor
Zainab Hussain in Bengaluru; Editing by Arun Koyyur/Keith Weir)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|