Aggressive U.S. energy policy tests ties with European allies
Send a link to a friend
[July 10, 2019]
By Timothy Gardner and Alissa de Carbonnel
WASHINGTON/BRUSSELS (Reuters) - For the
administration of President Donald Trump, a policy of "energy dominance"
means reducing dependence on imported oil and promoting exports to boost
the national economy and Washington's political influence overseas.
For many of America's European allies, however, it means unwelcome
interference in its markets.
The Trump administration has capitalized on a decade-long U.S. drilling
boom to pursue some of the most aggressive foreign energy policies in
the nation's history. So far, that has meant sanctions on oil exports
from OPEC-members Iran and Venezuela and threats against firms helping
Russia build a natural gas pipeline into Europe.
To fill the supply gap, Washington is promoting a rising wave of U.S.
crude oil and natural gas exports.
The Trump administration has billed the moves as a way to achieve
foreign policy goals, with the added benefit of helping both U.S. energy
producers expand their markets and American allies diversify their
supplies. But Washington has irritated many European diplomats and
energy companies who resent its growing global influence on energy
markets and view its policies mainly as a way to give U.S. producers an
advantage, according to interviews with diplomats, executives and
analysts.
Growing friction over energy is grating on trans-Atlantic ties that are
already strained by squabbles over NATO funding, trade, climate change
and diplomatic gaffes.
"We value highly the relationship with our American partners, allies and
friends," EU Economics Commissioner Pierre Moscovici told reporters at a
briefing in Brussels last month. “But ... they should also refrain from
unilateral action."
Moscovici also advocated using the euro in more international energy
transactions, which are almost universally conducted in U.S. dollars.
"We are all about the diplomacy, but you have to ask at some point
whether it is worth it," said another EU diplomat, who asked not to be
named.
The diplomat spoke to Reuters at a U.S. embassy party attended by U.S.
Energy Secretary Rick Perry in Brussels in June, where a handful of
other European diplomats were sharing gripes about what they saw as
Trump's brash, go-it-alone approach on energy.
A senior Trump administration official, speaking on condition of
anonymity, said the energy strategy aims at the mutual benefit of the
United States and its allies.
"What the U.S. energy sector is doing is unleashing our energy resources
and our technologies and sharing them with our partners and allies
around the world to help them diversify their energy mix and ensure
reliable supply," said the official.
A Department of Energy press release recently called U.S. gas exports to
Europe a way to spread "molecules of freedom" across the Atlantic.
The United States has become the world's top oil producer and is on a
path to become the world's third largest exporter of natural gas, thanks
to a technology-led drilling boom that the Trump administration has
sought to boost by slashing environmental regulations.
The United States sent of 43.3 million barrels of crude oil and products
to Europe in the six months ended in March, a 27 percent increase from
the same period a year earlier, according to the Energy Information
Administration. Meanwhile, U.S. liquefied natural gas exports to Europe
have nearly tripled since last year, when the European Commission agreed
to buy more in a trade meeting with Trump.
"Increasingly, the America First framework translates into advocating
for oil and gas sales around the world," said Tim Boersma, a senior
research scholar at Columbia University's Center on Global Energy
Policy.
EUROPEAN RESISTANCE
The unilateral U.S. sanctions on Iran and Venezuela would have triggered
steep oil price increases without the surge in U.S. supply.
Trump's decision last year to pull out of the Iran nuclear deal – which
has evolved into an unprecedented effort to completely block its oil
exports - was opposed by Europe's leaders and reluctantly accepted by
its energy companies, who faced U.S. penalties including being excluded
from the U.S. financial system.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump talks with Energy Secretary Rick Perry after
delivering remarks during an "Unleashing American Energy" event at
the Department of Energy in Washington, U.S., June 29, 2017.
REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo
Germany, France and the UK have since taken steps to resist
Washington, including setting up a barter-based trade mechanism
called Instex that would allow it to trade with Iran outside the
U.S. financial system in a way that skirts U.S. sanctions. Europe
hopes to use Instex to allow Iran to exchange its oil and gas or
other goods for medicine, food or other humanitarian supplies from
the EU.
"They have sovereignty and self-respect at issue here. They're
trying to say we're going to do Iran trade; we're going save the
nuclear deal and provide a mechanism; and we don't appreciate being
unilaterally dictated to," said Sanjay Mullick, a sanctions lawyer
at Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
SQUABBLES OVER SANCTIONS
Meanwhile, British-and Swiss-based trading houses and refineries
have received insistent calls from U.S. State Department officials
warning about trading oil products with sanctioned countries.
Last month, for example, Mark Saavedra, a State Department official
at the bureau of energy resources, called several European energy
trading houses to instruct them not to trade jet fuel with
Venezuela, a product that was not specifically on the U.S. sanctions
list for that country, according to three industry sources familiar
with the calls.
The U.S. has been trying to block shipments of refined fuels to the
Latin American country to prevent it from blending it with its heavy
crude oil to make it more suitable for export, part of an effort to
ratchet up pressure on socialist President Nicolas Maduro.
The sources said the trading houses believed the State Department
had overstepped its authority.
Frank Fannon, the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Energy
Resources, said don't expect State to put down the phone anytime
soon. Such requests, he said, are a friendly way to tell allies how
to avoid sanctions themselves.
"It may be unwelcome news, but it's important that we convey that
clearly and unequivocally," Fannon said.
FIGHTING A RUSSIAN PIPELINE
Trump has also hurled criticism at European nations for supporting a
long-planned, multi-billion-dollar Russian gas pipeline to Germany,
the Nord Stream 2, saying it would give Moscow too much influence
over Europe's biggest economy and threatening to sanction companies
that help the project.
That’s rubbed some EU diplomats and companies the wrong way.
"It will be a disaster for Europe to ditch Nord Stream 2 under U.S.
pressure," said Rainer Seele, CEO of energy company OMV Austria's
largest company and one of five European companies including
France's Engie helping to finance Nord Stream 2.
The Russian gas via pipeline is cheaper than U.S. liquid natural
gas, he said, and U.S. pressure threatens "Europe's independence and
security of energy supplies."
Some countries such as Poland and Lithuania, however, are happy to
buy the incoming U.S. liquefied natural gas shipments to help break
reliance and barter better prices from Russian gas export monopoly
Gazprom.
On June 12, Polish Oil and Gas Company (PGNiG) signed an agreement
with U.S. company Venture Global LNG to buy 1.5 million metric tons
of LNG a year.
But even diplomats opposed to Nord Stream 2 take issue with
Washington’s tone and tenor, according to the Reuters interviews.
"We don’t want to be dictated to," said one.
(Reporting by Timothy Gardner; Additional reporting by Alissa de
Carbonnel in Brussels, Dmitry Zhdannikov in London and Humeyra Pamuk
in Washington Editing by Richard Valdmanis and Brian Thevenot)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |