In
court papers filed on Tuesday, the American Civil Liberties
Union asked New York federal Judge Jesse Furman to grant new
discovery into the alleged misconduct, as well as monetary
sanctions for the government's "concerted campaign of delay and
obfuscation" during trial last November.
The request follows President Donald Trump's announcement last
week that he would abandon plans to ask respondents to the 2020
census whether they are U.S. citizens, after the U.S. Supreme
Court blocked the question in June.
The plaintiffs had argued the question would cause an undercount
in Hispanic and immigrant communities, to the detriment of their
political representation and access to federal aid.
They cited on Tuesday a laundry list of "false or misleading"
testimonies that amounted to "fraud on the court," perpetrated
by U.S. Department of Commerce Deputy Chief of Staff Earl
Comstock, Acting Assistant Attorney General John Gore, Commerce
attorney James Uthmeier, and U.S. Census Bureau official Christa
Jones, among others.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and his staff insisted the
DOJ had requested a citizenship question to help enforce the
federal Voting Rights Act. But evidence at trial showed Ross and
other top officials wanted to add the question to benefit
Republicans during the next round of redistricting, the ACLU
said. (https://tinyurl.com/y6z7rrj9)
In fact, it was Ross who asked the DOJ to make the request
containing the voting rights rationale.
The ACLU also took issue with the government's steadfast denial
of discriminatory motives for adding the question, when evidence
discovered after trial proved that late Republican redistricting
strategist Thomas Hofeller had hatched the plan as early as 2015
to benefit Republicans during redistricting.
The Justice Department declined to comment on Tuesday.
A Commerce Department spokesman could not be immediately
reached.
Trump's decision to drop his bid for a citizenship question was
not expected to end lawsuits. The president said he would ask
the Census Bureau to supply state governments with citizenship
data through other means, which could lead to a new host of
legal claims.
The sanctions motion comes after Trump lawyers last year tried
to sanction ACLU attorneys in a case over a pregnant immigrant
teen who wanted an abortion. The Supreme Court rejected that
request.
(Reporting by Nick Brown; Editing by Richard Chang)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|