“We know that food insecurity is associated with higher health care
costs, but there is substantial variation across the U.S.,” says
Craig Gundersen, distinguished professor of agricultural and
consumer economics in the College of Agricultural, Consumer and
Environmental Sciences at the University of Illinois. Gundersen is
co-author of the study, which takes a closer look at those
variations.
Food insecurity rates range from 6.8% in North Dakota to 17.6% in
Mississippi, with even greater variation at the county level. The
lowest rate of food insecurity in the country is 3% in Steele
County, North Dakota, while the highest is twelve times higher – 36%
– in Jefferson County, Mississippi.
In this study, the researchers established the additional costs of
health care due to food insecurity at the county level, using large,
nationally representative data sets on food insecurity rates, health
care expenditures, and health care costs.
The study is published by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention in their journal Health Services Review. Authors include
Gundersen; Seth Berkowitz, University of North Carolina; Sanjay Basu,
Stanford University; and Hilary Seligman, University of California,
San Francisco.
The researchers found that regardless of the local cost of health
care, higher food insecurity rates are strongly associated with
excess health care expenditures.
“There may be variation in health care expenditures across the
United States for two reasons: Variation in food insecurity rates,
and variation in health care costs. What we found in this work is
that the variation is mainly driven by differences in food
insecurity rather than differences in the average cost of health
care,” Gundersen explains.
[to top of second column] |
Overall, the study estimates that food insecurity accounts for more than $52
billion annually in excess health care spending. This is due to higher rates of
chronic illnesses, including diabetes, heart disease, kidney disease, and
depression, that are associated with food insecurity.
Implementing policies to reduce food insecurity makes economic sense, Gundersen
says. “Programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, are
designed to reduce food insecurity and do it well. When we think about
expansions in SNAP, it will not just reduce food insecurity but also reduce
health care expenditures.
“Many food-insecure households rely on programs like Medicaid or Medicare, which
are public programs. So the real cost to expanding SNAP is less that it appears,
when you take into consideration those health care costs,” Gundersen adds.
The study was funded by Feeding America, a non-profit organization that operates
a nationwide network of food banks. The data will be made available on Feeding
America’s website starting July 18, providing a tool for policy makers and
others to compare food insecurity rates and health care expenditures at the
county and state level across the United States.
The study, “State-level and county-level estimates of health care costs
associated with food insecurity,” is published in Health Services Review and is
available online [DOI: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180549]. The authors are
Seth A. Berkowitz, Sanjay Basu, Craig Gundersen, and Hilary K. Seligman.
[Source: Craig Gundersen, News
writer: Marianne Stein] |