| 
              
                
				 Research in that area has been limited and has yielded 
				conflicting results. A new study, published in Energy Science, 
				provides comprehensive data on how turbines affect bird 
				populations. 
 While the study did find a negative effect on some breeding 
				birds, it also suggests ways to mitigate that effect through 
				wind turbine design and placement, explains Madhu Khanna, 
				professor of agricultural and consumer economics in the College 
				of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences at the 
				University of Illinois. Khanna is co-author of the study.
 
 “We found that there was a negative impact of three birds lost 
				for every turbine within 400 meters of a bird habitat. The 
				impact faded away as distance increased,” Khanna says.
 
 Overall, the researchers estimate that about 150,000 birds are 
				affected by wind turbines in the U.S. every year. This includes 
				both direct and indirect effects; that is, bird collisions with 
				turbines as well as changes in bird habitat due to wind 
				disturbances and other factors. The effects vary for different 
				types of birds. When looking specifically at grassland birds, 
				the researchers found fewer negative impacts than for other 
				types of breeding birds.
 
 The researchers analyzed data on wind turbines, breeding birds, 
				land use, and weather across the United States over a six-year 
				period. The study included 1,670 wind turbines and 86 bird 
				observation routes across 36 states from 2008 to 2014.
 
 “We compared bird routes that were close to turbines with those 
				that were further away, making it possible to more easily and 
				precisely identify the impact of the turbine, while controlling 
				for other unobservable factors,” explains Ruiqing Miao, 
				assistant professor of agricultural economics at Auburn 
				University and lead author on the study.
 
              
                The negative impacts on birds identified in this 
				study are lower than estimates from some other studies. However, 
				those studies were done on a smaller scale. This research uses a 
				large dataset over a longer time frame, yielding more systematic 
				and accurate information. 
              
				[to top of second column] | 
              
 
			The researchers also found that the size of the wind 
			turbine and the length of the blades make a difference: taller 
			turbines and shorter blades reduce the impact on birds. Other 
			studies have found that turbine height was negatively correlated 
			with bird count, but the present study separated height from blade 
			length and found length to be the more important factor. 
			
			 
			The study’s findings can be used to inform decisions about the 
			placement and design of wind turbines. Because the impact on birds 
			diminishes as the distance increases, the researchers suggest that 
			wind turbines be placed outside a 1,600 meter buffer zone of 
			high-density bird habitats. They also recommend that turbines be 
			taller but with shorter blade length.
 Policy decisions regarding wind energy must consider the tradeoff 
			between sustainable energy and bird populations, Khanna points out. 
			“No single technology is such that it is only beneficial and has no 
			negative consequences. You can minimize the effect by making the 
			recommended adjustments,” she says.
 
 The article, “Effect of wind turbines on bird abundance: A national 
			scale analysis based on fixed effects models” is published in Energy 
			Policy. 
			https://doi. org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.040 ]
 
 Authors include Ruiqing Miao, Prasenjit N. Ghosh, and Jian Rong, 
			Auburn University; Madhu Khanna, University of Illinois; and Weiwei 
			Wang, Dell Financial Services, Austin, Texas.
 
			[Source: Madhu Khanna, News writer: 
			Marianne Stein] |