Research in that area has been limited and has yielded
conflicting results. A new study, published in Energy Science,
provides comprehensive data on how turbines affect bird
populations.
While the study did find a negative effect on some breeding
birds, it also suggests ways to mitigate that effect through
wind turbine design and placement, explains Madhu Khanna,
professor of agricultural and consumer economics in the College
of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences at the
University of Illinois. Khanna is co-author of the study.
“We found that there was a negative impact of three birds lost
for every turbine within 400 meters of a bird habitat. The
impact faded away as distance increased,” Khanna says.
Overall, the researchers estimate that about 150,000 birds are
affected by wind turbines in the U.S. every year. This includes
both direct and indirect effects; that is, bird collisions with
turbines as well as changes in bird habitat due to wind
disturbances and other factors. The effects vary for different
types of birds. When looking specifically at grassland birds,
the researchers found fewer negative impacts than for other
types of breeding birds.
The researchers analyzed data on wind turbines, breeding birds,
land use, and weather across the United States over a six-year
period. The study included 1,670 wind turbines and 86 bird
observation routes across 36 states from 2008 to 2014.
“We compared bird routes that were close to turbines with those
that were further away, making it possible to more easily and
precisely identify the impact of the turbine, while controlling
for other unobservable factors,” explains Ruiqing Miao,
assistant professor of agricultural economics at Auburn
University and lead author on the study.
The negative impacts on birds identified in this
study are lower than estimates from some other studies. However,
those studies were done on a smaller scale. This research uses a
large dataset over a longer time frame, yielding more systematic
and accurate information.
[to top of second column] |
The researchers also found that the size of the wind
turbine and the length of the blades make a difference: taller
turbines and shorter blades reduce the impact on birds. Other
studies have found that turbine height was negatively correlated
with bird count, but the present study separated height from blade
length and found length to be the more important factor.
The study’s findings can be used to inform decisions about the
placement and design of wind turbines. Because the impact on birds
diminishes as the distance increases, the researchers suggest that
wind turbines be placed outside a 1,600 meter buffer zone of
high-density bird habitats. They also recommend that turbines be
taller but with shorter blade length.
Policy decisions regarding wind energy must consider the tradeoff
between sustainable energy and bird populations, Khanna points out.
“No single technology is such that it is only beneficial and has no
negative consequences. You can minimize the effect by making the
recommended adjustments,” she says.
The article, “Effect of wind turbines on bird abundance: A national
scale analysis based on fixed effects models” is published in Energy
Policy.
https://doi. org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.040 ]
Authors include Ruiqing Miao, Prasenjit N. Ghosh, and Jian Rong,
Auburn University; Madhu Khanna, University of Illinois; and Weiwei
Wang, Dell Financial Services, Austin, Texas.
[Source: Madhu Khanna, News writer:
Marianne Stein] |