As a result, researchers estimate that more Britons have developed
heart disease or gastric cancer than would have been the case under
the stricter old policy.
Between 2003 and 2010, average salt intake was falling annually by
0.20 grams a day in men and 0.12 grams a day in women, the study
found. But progress slowed from 2011 to 2014, when average annual
salt intake dropped by just 0.11 grams a day in men and 0.07 grams a
day in women.
"The old system set independent targets for salt reduction and
monitored these," said Anthony Laverty, lead author of the study and
a public health researcher at Imperial College London. "There was
incentive for the food industry to change foods to have less salt in
them, alongside some public awareness campaigns and bringing in food
labeling."
But after 2011, "the industry was not under the same amount of
scrutiny and their efforts to reduce salt in foods seems to have
waned," Laverty said by email.
Dietary salt can damage the stomach lining, which over time can
sometimes lead to gastric cancer, previous research has found. Too
much salt is also linked to high blood pressure, a major risk factor
for cardiovascular disease, heart attacks and strokes.
Using computer simulations, the researchers estimated how the change
in salt policy influenced the patterns of salt-related disease in
the population. From 2011 to 2018, the smaller yearly reductions in
sodium intake may have been responsible for approximately 9,000
additional cases of cardiovascular disease and 1,500 more cases of
gastric cancer than would have occurred under the previous salt
policy, the study team reports in the Journal of Epidemiology &
Community Health.
If the current policy remains in place, it may cause an additional
26,000 cases of cardiovascular disease and 3,800 cases of gastric
cancer between 2019 and 2025, researchers estimate.
These extra cases of cardiovascular disease and cancer added up to
160 million British pounds ($199.89 million) in additional
healthcare costs and lost productivity between 2011 and 2018, the
researchers calculate. And if the current policy continues, the
added health costs and lost productivity will exceed 1 billion
pounds by 2025, they estimate.
[to top of second column] |
Adults should consume no more than about 2,000 milligrams of sodium
per day, which is the amount found in around 5 grams or one teaspoon
of salt, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).
Men and women in the UK consume much more salt than they should: an
average of 9.1 grams a day for men and 6.7 grams a day for women as
of 2014, the study team notes.
Sodium is found not only in table salt, but in a variety of foods
such as bread, milk, eggs, meat, and shellfish as well as processed
items like pretzels, popcorn, soy sauce and bouillon or stock cubes.
The study wasn't designed to prove that the slowdown in yearly
reductions in salt consumption caused additional cases of disease.
The researchers also examined trends for the whole population and
didn't look at health outcomes for individuals based on their
specific levels of salt consumption.
It's also not clear whether salt intake would have continued to
decline at the pre-2011 pace in the absence of a policy shift in the
UK, said Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian of the Friedman School of Nutrition
Science & Policy at Tufts University.
"Many of the 'easier' wins in sodium reduction had already been
leveraged by 2012: lowering sodium in certain products, by modest
amounts, is technically much easier than larger reductions or
reductions in other types of products," Mozaffarian, who wasn't
involved in the study, said by email. "Achieving further linear
reductions at the same pace would be unlikely."
Both the current and the previous salt policies in the UK did lead
to reductions in salt intake, suggesting that more than one approach
may help, Mozaffarian added.
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2OgXV5g Journal of Epidemiology and Community
Health, online July 18, 2019.
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |