Compared to patients from the wealthiest counties, those from the
poorest counties were half as likely to get their blood pressure
under control during a six-year-clinical trial, researchers report
in the Journal of the American Heart Association.
"We found that even if everyone is going to the doctor and getting
their medications, there are still differences based on the
socioeconomic context under which they live and obtain their care,"
said the study's lead author Dr. Andi Shahu, a resident physician at
Johns Hopkins Hospital. "Our hypothesis moving forward is that maybe
other social factors we are not measuring well could be at play
here."
"There are lots of reasons why these disparities may exist," Shahu
said. "For example, people who live in a lower socioeconomic county
may feel less safe (possibly because of higher crime rates). They
may not have access to healthy food. They may not be able to
exercise or do other things to support their heart health in
addition to taking medication."
To take a closer look at the impact of socioeconomic status on blood
pressure control, Spatz and his colleagues reanalyzed data from the
Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart
Attack Trial (ALLHAT). In that trial, hypertensive patients were
randomly assigned to receive one of three blood pressure lowering
drugs for six years to test whether any one was better than the
others. The study used 140/90 mm Hg as the threshold for high blood
pressure designation. The current American Heart Association
guidelines lowered the cutoff to 130/80 mm Hg.
The researchers focused on 27,862 ALLHAT participants. Because
ALLHAT didn't collect information on each participant's income,
Shahu and his colleagues used the income level of the county where
study participants went to get their care. That meant 2,169 patients
fell into the lowest income bracket as compared to 10,458 receiving
care in the highest income counties.
Participants in the lowest income group were more likely to be
women, to be black, to be Hispanic, to have fewer years of
education, to live in the South and to have fewer cardiovascular
risk factors.
[to top of second column] |
When the researchers compared the patients from the poorest counties
to those from the wealthiest, they found, after accounting for
cardiovascular risk factors, that patients were 52% less likely to
reach the blood pressure goal of 140/90 mm Hg, were 25% more likely
to die from any cause, were 26% more likely to be hospitalized or
die from heart failure and 86% more likely to develop end-stage
kidney disease.
They were also 30% less likely to be hospitalized for chest pain and
29% less likely to undergo cardiac revascularization, a procedure to
open up blood vessels. Shahu suspects that last statistic, while
sounding like an advantage, might simply be the result of patients
not having access to the procedure. "Other studies have shown that
people in lower socioeconomic communities, and minorities in
particular, are less likely to receive these procedures because of
lack of access to care," Shahu said.
The new findings are "really upsetting," said Dr. Suzanne Steinbaum,
director of Women's Cardiovascular Prevention, Health and Wellness
at The Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City. "This is a six year
trial where the patients had access to medication and doctors'
visits. All these bigger issues are taken care of, but we see that
patients from lower socioeconomic counties have less of a chance of
getting their blood pressure under control--and that's when they
were aiming for 140/90 mm Hg, and not the current 130/80 mm Hg."
One big issue unaccounted for in the original study was whether
patients were taking their blood pressure medications as prescribed,
Steinbaum said. The new findings may be a sign that patients aren't
getting properly educated about the importance of their medications,
she added.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2OsvtgR Journal of the American Heart
Association, online July 31, 2019.
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |