Democratic hopeful Warren proposes $2
trillion 'green manufacturing' plan
Send a link to a friend
[June 05, 2019]
By Ginger Gibson
DETROIT (Reuters) - Democratic U.S.
presidential hopeful Elizabeth Warren proposed on Tuesday spending $2
trillion on a new "green manufacturing" program to address climate
change that would invest in research and exporting American clean energy
technology.
The manufacturing program is the first in a new series of "economic
patriotism" proposals Warren is unveiling intended to create American
jobs and help U.S. industry.
"This is going to be a big plan for bold structural changes," Warren
said at a campaign rally in Detroit, Michigan.
Warren told the crowd of about 500 in a facility that teaches
manufacturing skills that her proposal would be paid for by cutting
subsidies in the oil and gas industry. Additionally, by all companies
paying more taxes, she said, singling out Amazon.com.
Among the more than 20 Democrats in the field hoping to challenge
Republican President Donald Trump in November 2020, Warren has
distinguished herself as the most prolific proposer of new policy
positions.
Several candidates have offered climate-related policy proposals,
including Washington Governor Jay Inslee, who has made it the singular
focus of his campaign, and former Vice President Joe Biden, who also
announced a climate plan on Tuesday.
Warren said she had not read Biden's proposal when asked by reporters
after her campaign event.
The newest proposal from Warren, a U.S. senator from Massachusetts, lays
out how she would carry out some of the policy goals outlined in the
Green New Deal, which has the backing of liberal members of her party.
Warren began touting the proposal in a campaign trip to Michigan, a
Midwestern state with a large manufacturing sector that shocked
political observers in 2016 when voters backed Trump and helped propel
him to the White House.
"When we’re talking about manufacturing, when we’re talking about real
expertise, we’re talking about Detroit," Warren said.
The plan is likely to draw criticism from opponents who will argue the
price tag is too high and that trying to quickly overhaul the U.S.
energy sector would have crippling economic effects.
But Warren also released an evaluation of her three-part proposal
conducted by Moody's economist Mark Zandi, who argued the plan would
help the economy on a large scale.
"There is no free lunch, and big businesses, oil and gas companies, and
multinationals pay for the cost of this plan," Zandi wrote. "The economy
benefits, although it would take more than a decade for this benefit to
be fully realized."
[to top of second column]
|
Democratic presidential candidate and U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren
(D-MA) speaks during the California Democratic Convention in San
Francisco, California, U.S. June 1, 2019. REUTERS/Stephen Lam
The first part of Warren's plan calls for spending $400 billion over
10 years on clean energy research and development.
Warren said she believes the United States could one day use no
fossil fuels. "It’s part of our technological bandwidth," she said
in a brief news conference after the Detroit rally.
Next, Warren proposed increasing the amount the United States spends
on "American-made clean, renewable, and emission-free energy
products for federal, state, and local use, and for export."
Warren said the United States currently spends $1.5 trillion on
defense procurement, which she called "bloated," and argued that an
equal amount should be spent on clean energy.
As part of this proposal, Warren would require companies that sell
to the federal government pay their employees at least $15 an hour,
that employees receive 12 weeks paid family and medical leave and be
able to form unions. Labor practices were included in Green New Deal
proposals.
Finally, Warren called for creating a new federal office responsible
for trying to get foreign countries to purchase U.S. clean energy
technology.
Likening it to programs that help foreign countries buy U.S.-made
weapons, Warren would allocate $100 billion to assist countries
buying U.S. energy technologies.
While acknowledging ambitious goals that liberal advocates have
supported to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050,
Warren said it was important that other countries cut emissions as
well.
"We need other countries to slash their emissions, and that means we
need to supply the world with clean energy products (at low enough
prices to displace dirty alternatives) to put us on the right path,"
Warren wrote on Medium.
(Reporting by Ginger Gibson; editing by Paul Tait and Bill Berkrot)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|