|
 "I'm not afraid of anyone. No one can harm me and the others while
we're harvesting poppy," he said as he took a break from working his
field.
As pressure grows for a political settlement to end 18 years of war
in Afghanistan, the drug trade remains a major threat, leaving the
country at the risk of becoming a "narco-state", the Special
Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), a U.S.
Congressional watchdog, said in recent report.
Growing opium is theoretically a crime in Afghanistan but it is a
way of life for tens of thousands of farmers like Ahmadi, who feeds
a family of 14 with the money he makes from selling the sticky,
brown sap from the poppies in his fields to be refined into heroin.
Efforts to develop alternative crops like saffron for poor farmers
have had some success, but overall, they have hardly put a dent in
the drugs trade.
"I want to continue my studies but economic issues force me to do
this," Ahmadi said, blaming the government for not creating the
conditions for other jobs.
For years, Afghanistan has been the global leader in opium
production, despite some $8.9 billion spent since 2002 by the U.S.
government to stop production and trafficking in narcotics.
With compelling economic incentives and politically protected
networks - from cultivators to producers and distributors - deeply
entrenched, officials say there is little they can do to stop it.
"We don't have the ability to annihilate poppy cultivation in all of
the country," said Gul Mohammad Shukran, head of counter-narcotics
in Kandahar.
The U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) in 2018 estimated that
263,000 hectares of land produced 6,400 metric tonnes of opium in 24
of Afghanistan's 34 provinces.
In a bad year for drought, that represented a 20% decline in the
area under cultivation from the record year in 2017, but it was
still the second highest in recent years.
By contrast, efforts to wipe out the crop have been meager and just
406 hectares were cleared last year, according to the UNODC,
hampered in part by expanding Taliban control over larger parts of
the country.
[to top of second column] |
BOMBING, BAN
About half of Afghanistan's opium is produced in areas of high
insurgent activity, according to SIGAR.
"It is increasingly getting very difficult to destroy standing crops
due to the fighting and the increased Taliban control in
poppy-yielding provinces," said Mohammad Hashim Aurtaq, the deputy
interior minister in Kabul who oversees opium eradication.
Air strikes are the only way to dent drug production, he said.
Since late 2017, U.S. forces have attacked sites believed to be used
for processing drugs as part of efforts to cut off funds to the
Taliban, who profit greatly from narcotics.
However, results have been modest, according to SIGAR.
Between November 2017 and May 2018, U.S. air and ground strikes
against drug processing sites cost the Taliban some $86 million in
lost revenues, raw materials and equipment, SIGAR said.
That compares with an estimated $600 million generated for Afghan
farmers in 2018 from a trade that is reckoned to be the equivalent
to as much as 30% of Afghanistan's entire legitimate economic
output.
For their part, the Taliban, who famously banned opium growing in
2000, when they held power across most of the country, have
suggested they will once again eliminate the poppies if peace talks
succeed.
For the moment, however, drugs provide them with a stream of revenue
from levies on farmers and traffickers, and they say they are
reluctant to disrupt the lives of farmers like Ahmadi.
"We have neither banned nor promoted poppy cultivation," said the
chief Taliban spokesman, Zabiullah Mujahid.
"We don't ban poppy cultivation because banning the crops means
going against poor local people and it is not the right time for us
go against our people."
(Additional reporting by Rupam Jain, Abdul Qadir Sediqi in KABUL;
Editing by Robert Birsel)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |
