| 
		Virginia Republicans lose in U.S. Supreme 
		Court racial gerrymandering case 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [June 18, 2019] 
		By Lawrence Hurley 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme 
		Court on Monday handed Republican legislators in Virginia a defeat, 
		leaving in place a ruling that invalidated state electoral districts 
		they drew because they weakened the clout of black voters in violation 
		of the U.S. Constitution.
 
 The justices, in a 5-4 decision, sidestepped a ruling on the merits of 
		the case. They instead found that the Republican-led state House of 
		Delegates lacked the necessary legal standing to appeal a lower court 
		ruling that had invalidated 11 state House districts for racial 
		discrimination.
 
 Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring, a Democrat and the state's top 
		law enforcement official, opposed the appeal and argued that the 
		Republican legislators were not entitled to act on behalf of the state 
		in the case. A new political map is being used for this year's state 
		elections.
 
 "Virginia's elections this fall will take place in fair, constitutional 
		districts. It's a good day for democracy in Virginia," Herring wrote on 
		Twitter.
 
		
		 
		
 The Supreme Court's action let stand a 2018 ruling by a federal 
		three-judge panel that the 11 districts all violated the rights of black 
		voters to equal protection under the law under the U.S. Constitution's 
		14th Amendment.
 
 The state's Republican-led House of Delegates "lacks authority to 
		displace Virginia's attorney general as representative of the state," 
		Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the court's majority.
 
 "In short, Virginia would rather stop than fight on. One house of its 
		bicameral legislature cannot alone continue the litigation against the 
		will of its partners in the legislative process," Ginsburg added.
 
 The court was not split on ideological lines, with Ginsburg joined in 
		the majority by fellow liberal justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor 
		as well as two conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.
 
 The case involved a hot topic for the Supreme Court: a practice called 
		gerrymandering involving the manipulation of electoral district 
		boundaries to marginalize a certain set of voters and increase the 
		influence of others. In this case, the Republican legislators were 
		accused of racial gerrymandering to disadvantage black voters.
 
		In two other major cases from Maryland and North Carolina, the justices 
		are considering whether courts can curb gerrymandering aimed at purely 
		partisan advantage. They are due to rule in those cases by the end of 
		this month.
 At issue in the Virginia case was the state legislative map drawn by 
		Republicans after the 2010 national census.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Demonstrators protest during a Fair Maps rally outside the U.S. 
			Supreme Court, in Washington, U.S., March 26, 2019. REUTERS/Brendan 
			McDermid/File Photo 
            
 
            'SEEDS CONFUSION'
 The National Republican Redistricting Trust, a group that backs 
			Republican efforts to redraw electoral districts, criticized the 
			ruling.
 
 "It seeds confusion into a volatile, evolving body of law that 
			demands clarity just as the next redistricting cycle begins," said 
			Adam Kincaid, the group's executive director.
 
 New electoral maps will be drawn nationwide following the 2020 
			census.
 
 Since the Virginia maps that were challenged in the case were drawn, 
			Democrats have made gains in Virginia in both state and federal 
			elections. The current governor, Ralph Northam, and Herring, both 
			are Democrats. Northam has been involved in a racial controversy of 
			his own this year after a racist photo from his 1984 medical school 
			yearbook page surfaced.
 
 "This is a welcome ruling from the Supreme Court - it's like I've 
			always said, voters should choose their representatives, not the 
			other way around," Northam said on Twitter.
 
 Like other U.S. southern states, Virginia has a complicated racial 
			history dating back to the era of slavery.
 
 The voters who brought the legal challenge accused Republicans of 
			packing black voters into certain state House districts to diminish 
			their voting power and make surrounding districts more white and 
			more likely to support Republicans.
 
            
			 
			Democrats have accused President Donald Trump's fellow Republicans 
			in Virginia and other states of crafting such legislative maps in a 
			way that crams black and other minority voters, who tend to favor 
			Democratic candidates, into certain districts in order to reduce 
			their overall sway in the state.
 (Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |