U.S. says rejects WTO's 'straitjacket' of trade
obligations
Send a link to a friend
[March 02, 2019]
By David Lawder and Alexandra Alper
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Trump
administration filed another salvo at the World Trade Organization on
Friday, saying U.S. trade policy was not going to be dictated by the
international body and defending its use of tariffs to pressure China
and other trade partners.
A report drawn up by the U.S. Trade Representative outlining the White
House's trade agenda for 2019 said the United States will continue to
use the Switzerland-based WTO to challenge what it sees as unfair
practices.
However, "the United States remains an independent nation, and our trade
policy will be made here – not in Geneva. We will not allow the WTO
Appellate Body and dispute settlement system to force the United States
into a straitjacket of obligations to which we never agreed," the report
said.
The United States has imposed tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese
imports to press its demands for changes to what Washington sees as
China's unfair policies on intellectual property protections, technology
transfers, industrial subsidies and domestic market access.
China has challenged the Trump administration's tariffs in the WTO,
arguing that they violate its agreed rules. The case is likely to be
ultimately decided by the WTO's Appellate Body, the world's top trade
court.
The United States must be allowed the "policy space" to address trade
problems, the report said.
"That policy space must include the ability to use tariffs or other
forms of leverage to persuade other countries to take our concerns
seriously," it said.
The report was not explicit about how the United States would respond to
a ruling against it on the issue.
[to top of second column] |
A logo is pictured outside the World Trade Organization (WTO)
headquarters next to a red traffic light in Geneva, Switzerland,
October 2, 2018. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/File Photo
The report was published a day after a WTO adjudication panel handed Washington
a major victory over China, ruling that China's domestic price supports for
wheat and rice constituted an excessive subsidy and violated WTO obligations.
APPELLATE JUDGES
The United States has argued for years that WTO judges have routinely broken
with procedures and exceeded their mandates, imposing new obligations on
members.
In an effort to force reforms, Washington has routinely blocked the appointment
of judges to its Appellate Body, a process that requires consensus among member
states. If continued, the tactic will render the body inoperable by December,
when terms end for two of the remaining three judges. WTO rules require three
judges to hear appeals.
While Trump's complaints have found some sympathy among other WTO members,
blocking new appointments is widely opposed as it risks crippling a guardian of
international law. Friday's report did not mention U.S. actions to block judges.
The report defended U.S. actions to impose steel and aluminum tariffs on
national security grounds, adding that national security exceptions have long
been recognized at the WTO and its predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs
and Trade (GATT).
If the WTO were to overrule the U.S. determination that the tariffs were
essential to national security, it "would threaten serious damage to the
multilateral trading system," it said.
(Reporting by David Lawder and Alexandra Alper; Editing by Sonya Hepinstall)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |