Easier for China to face tariffs than bend to U.S.
pressure
Send a link to a friend
[March 04, 2019]
By Michael Martina
BEIJING (Reuters) - China will acknowledge
concessions made in any trade deal with the United States for the sake
of stabilizing shaky relations, but is unlikely to yield to demands it
alter its economic model even if faced with continued tariffs, many
trade experts believe.
U.S. President Donald Trump has warned he could walk away from a China
deal if it were not good enough, even as his advisers touted "fantastic"
progress toward an agreement to end a dispute that has put tit-for-tat
tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of each others' goods.
Such optimism has taken a different shape in Beijing, where the delay on
a once "hard" March 1 deadline for a U.S. tariff hike reinforced views
that Trump's appetite for tough measures has weakened as the 2020
presidential election draws closer and a strong U.S. economy shows
initial signs of flagging.
Chinese concessions in any deal are likely to fall short of U.S. demands
for deep change in the way the world's second-largest economy works.
Revamping decades of state planning will not happen overnight, Chinese
experts argue.
And President Xi Jinping faces political realities at home, where being
seen as kowtowing to Trump would be less palatable than navigating the
near-term impact continued trade tensions might have on China's own
slowing economy, they say.
One Chinese official told Reuters that China's domestic reform was a
long-term process.
"If the United States carries out overall restrictions or pressure based
on its own interests, China will not accept it," the official said.
Tu Xinquan, a trade expert at Beijing's University of International
Business and Economics, said it would be difficult for Xi to agree to
U.S. demands that China revamp the role of state-owned enterprises and
other core industrial policies.
Xi would likely be prepared to go as far as to give "visible,
politically influential commitments" to Trump, such as to buy more
American goods and improve protection of intellectual property rights (IPR).
The United States has long complained that Beijing has systematically
obtained American companies' intellectual property through coercion and
outright theft. But improving copyright and trademark enforcement is
seen by hardliners in Washington as a practical and self-interested move
for China, now that it has innovative companies of its own.
China verifiably cracking down on the more existential threat of forced
technology transfer - which officials deny actually occurs - or
substantially curbing the influence of state-owned companies in the
economy is seen as less likely.
"The core features of the Chinese model – these issues will be left to
the future," Tu said.
'MAR-A-LAGO ACCORD'?
Sources have suggested that the two sides are getting closer to a deal
that could roll back some tariffs and set forth agreements on structural
issues in China's economic model, but that details of an enforcement
mechanism to ensure Beijing follows through on policy pledges are still
not set.
[to top of second column] |
Shipping containers are seen at a port in Lianyungang, Jiangsu
province, China September 8, 2018. REUTERS/Stringer
While no plans have been announced, there is widespread speculation in trade
circles that Xi could travel to Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida to hammer
out a final deal in late March, on the tail end of a planned trip to Europe.
Some in U.S. diplomatic and business communities, concerned that Trump could
rush into accepting weak Chinese commitments, have been for weeks referring,
with mock grandiosity, to a possible deal as the "Mar-a-Lago Accord".
China's willingness to make smaller commitments is driven by a desire to
stabilize U.S.-China relations and prevent the trade dispute from spreading,
which has become more salient as Washington pressures its allies to jettison
cooperation with Chinese tech champions, including Huawei Technologies.
"We are afraid this conflict will be extended to other areas, even affecting the
relationship between China and the West. So we want to control it. Maybe not
solve all the problems, but control it and calm it down," Tu said.
China hopes commitments to purchase more U.S. goods, along with pledges to
improve its reporting of subsidies at the World Trade Organization and IPR
enforcement can clinch an interim deal, according to Chinese trade experts.
Trump has delayed the threatened hike in tariffs on some $200 billion in Chinese
imports to 25 percent from 10 percent, which was due to kick-in on Friday.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has signaled that tariffs would
remain an important tool to push China to address U.S. concerns over Chinese
industrial policies, saying in written testimony at Congressional hearings last
week that trade issues with China were too serious to be resolved merely through
stepped-up purchases.
Zhang Huanbo, a researcher at the China Center for International Economic
Exchanges (CCIEE), a well-connected think-tank in Beijing, said China would not
agree to abolish subsidies but it would correct market-distorting subsidies so
they were "in-line with WTO rules".
Xi, who fundamentally believes in a strong role for the state and the ruling
Communist Party in the economy, does not want to, and cannot, quickly dismantle
decades of state planning, political analysts say.
But he still has room to give the United States more market access in the
service industry and for agricultural products.
Shi Yinhong, director of the Center for American Studies at Renmin University,
said beyond those types of openings China had to attend to its "own basic
dignity and authority".
"If China makes too big a concession to the United States, it might create
domestic economic disorder. And also how would you explain it to Communist Party
members and the Chinese people?" said Shi, who has advised the government on
diplomatic matters.
(Reporting by Michael Martina, Kevin Yao, Xu Jing and Gao Liangping in BEIJING;
Editing by Alex Richardson)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |