Defiant U.S. sheriffs push gun
sanctuaries, imitating liberals on immigration
Send a link to a friend
[March 04, 2019]
By Daniel Trotta
(Reuters) - A rapidly growing number of
counties in at least four states are declaring themselves Second
Amendment sanctuaries, refusing to enforce gun-control laws that they
consider to be infringements on the U.S. constitutional right to keep
and bear arms.
Organizers of the pro-gun sanctuaries admit they took the idea from
liberals who have created immigration sanctuaries across the United
States where local officials defy the Trump administration's efforts to
enforce tougher immigration laws.
Now local conservatives are rebelling against majority Democratic rule
in the states. Elected sheriffs and county commissioners say they might
allow some people deemed to be threats under "red flag" laws to keep
their firearms. In states where the legal age for gun ownership is
raised to 21, authorities in some jurisdictions could refuse to
confiscate guns from 18- to 20-year-olds.
Democrats took control of state governments or widened leads in
legislative chambers last November, then followed through on promises to
enact gun control in response to an epidemic of mass shootings in public
spaces, religious sites and schools.
Resistance to those laws is complicating Democratic efforts to enact gun
control in Washington, Oregon, New Mexico and Illinois, even though the
party holds the governorship and both chambers of the state legislature
in all four states.
The sanctuary movement is exposing the rift between rural and urban
America as much as the one between the Republican and Democratic
parties, as small, conservative counties push back against statewide
edicts passed by big-city politicians.
"If they want to have their own laws, that's fine. Don't shove them on
us down here," said Dave Campbell, a member of the board of Effingham
County, Illinois, about 215 miles (350 km) south of Chicago.
Backers of the sanctuary movement say they want to take it nationwide.
Leaders in all four states where it has taken hold have formed a loose
alliance, sometimes sharing strategies or texts of resolutions. They
also say they are talking with like-minded activists in California, New
York, Iowa and Idaho.
As it grows, the rebellion is setting up a potential clash between state
and local officials.
In Washington, nearly 60 percent of the voters in November approved
Initiative 1639, which raises the minimum age to purchase a
semiautomatic rifle to 21, enhances background checks and increases the
waiting period to buy such guns to 10 days.
The law is due to take effect in July, but sheriffs in more than half of
Washington's 39 counties have pledged not to enforce it, pro-gun
activists say, and five counties have passed resolutions to the same
effect.
Governor Jay Inslee has firmly backed I-1639 and Attorney General Bob
Ferguson has advised sheriffs "they could be held liable" if they allow
a dangerous person to acquire a firearm later used to do harm.
Sheriff Bob Songer of Klickitat County, population 22,000, called
Ferguson's warning a "bluff" and said he would not enforce I-1639
because he considered it unconstitutional.
"Unfortunately for the governor and the attorney general, they're not my
boss. My only boss is the people that elected me to office," Songer
said.
[to top of second column]
|
Cibola County Sheriff Tony Mace before the county commission meeting
in Grants, New Mexico, U.S., February 28, 2019. Picture taken
February 28, 2019. REUTERS/Adria Malcolm
GAINING MOMENTUM
Support for Second Amendment sanctuaries has gained momentum in
recent weeks, especially among county boards in New Mexico and
Illinois.
Sixty-three counties or municipalities in Illinois have passed some
form of a firearms sanctuary resolution and more are likely to,
Campbell said.
Twenty-five of New Mexico's 33 counties have passed resolutions to
support sheriffs who refuse to enforce any firearms laws that they
consider unconstitutional, according to the New Mexico Sheriffs
Association. In some cases hundreds of pro-gun activists have packed
county commissioner meetings.
In Oregon, voters in eight counties approved Second Amendment
Preservation Ordinances last November that allow sheriffs to
determine which state gun laws to enforce.
Organizers in Oregon plan to put even more defiant "sanctuary
ordinance" measures on county ballots in 2020 that will direct their
officials to resist state gun laws.
Such sanctuary resolutions could face legal challenges but backers
say they have yet to face a lawsuit, in part because the Washington
initiative has yet to take effect and the Illinois and New Mexico
legislation has yet to pass.
The chief counsel for a leading U.S. gun-control group questioned
the legality of the sanctuary movement, saying state legislatures
make laws and courts interpret them, not sheriffs.
"It should not be up to individual sheriffs or police officers
deciding which laws they personally like," said Jonathan Lowy of the
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "This attitude shows a
disrespect for the way our system of government is supposed to
operate."
In New Mexico, the legislature is moving forward with a slate of
gun-control bills. One would enhance background checks and another
would create a red-flag law keeping guns out of the hands of people
deemed dangerous by a judge.
The New Mexico Sheriffs Association is leading the resistance,
saying the red-flag law would violate due process rights and was
unnecessary given current statutes.
Tony Mace, sheriff of Cibola County and chairman of the statewide
group, said the background check law would impose regulations on
hunting buddies or competitive shooters every time they share guns,
and he refuses to spend resources investigating such cases.
New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham accused the rebellious
sheriffs of falsely promoting the idea that "someone is coming for
their firearms," saying none of the proposed laws infringe on Second
Amendment rights."It's an exhausting charade," Lujan Grisham said.
(Reporting by Daniel Trotta in New York; editing by Dina Kyriakidou
and Grant McCool)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |