Easier for China to face tariffs than
bend to U.S. pressure
Send a link to a friend
[March 04, 2019]
By Michael Martina
BEIJING (Reuters) - China will acknowledge
concessions made in any trade deal with the United States for the sake
of stabilizing shaky relations, but is unlikely to yield to demands it
alter its economic model even if faced with continued tariffs, many
trade experts believe.
U.S. President Donald Trump has warned he could walk away from a China
deal if it were not good enough, even as his advisers touted "fantastic"
progress toward an agreement to end a dispute that has put tit-for-tat
tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of each others' goods.
Such optimism has taken a different shape in Beijing, where the delay on
a once "hard" March 1 deadline for a U.S. tariff hike reinforced views
that Trump's appetite for tough measures has weakened as the 2020
presidential election draws closer and a strong U.S. economy shows
initial signs of flagging.
Chinese concessions in any deal are likely to fall short of U.S. demands
for deep change in the way the world's second-largest economy works.
Revamping decades of state planning will not happen overnight, Chinese
experts argue.
And President Xi Jinping faces political realities at home, where being
seen as kowtowing to Trump would be less palatable than navigating the
near-term impact continued trade tensions might have on China's own
slowing economy, they say.
One Chinese official told Reuters that China's domestic reform was a
long-term process.
"If the United States carries out overall restrictions or pressure based
on its own interests, China will not accept it," the official said.
Tu Xinquan, a trade expert at Beijing's University of International
Business and Economics, said it would be difficult for Xi to agree to
U.S. demands that China revamp the role of state-owned enterprises and
other core industrial policies.
Xi would likely be prepared to go as far as to give "visible,
politically influential commitments" to Trump, such as to buy more
American goods and improve protection of intellectual property rights (IPR).
The United States has long complained that Beijing has systematically
obtained American companies' intellectual property through coercion and
outright theft. But improving copyright and trademark enforcement is
seen by hardliners in Washington as a practical and self-interested move
for China, now that it has innovative companies of its own.
China verifiably cracking down on the more existential threat of forced
technology transfer - which officials deny actually occurs - or
substantially curbing the influence of state-owned companies in the
economy is seen as less likely.
"The core features of the Chinese model – these issues will be left to
the future," Tu said.
'MAR-A-LAGO ACCORD'?
Sources have suggested that the two sides are getting closer to a deal
that could roll back some tariffs and set forth agreements on structural
issues in China's economic model, but that details of an enforcement
mechanism to ensure Beijing follows through on policy pledges are still
not set.
While no plans have been announced, there is widespread speculation in
trade circles that Xi could travel to Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in
Florida to hammer out a final deal in late March, on the tail end of a
planned trip to Europe.
[to top of second column]
|
Shipping containers are seen at a port in Lianyungang, Jiangsu
province, China September 8, 2018. REUTERS/Stringer
Some in U.S. diplomatic and business communities, concerned that
Trump could rush into accepting weak Chinese commitments, have been
for weeks referring, with mock grandiosity, to a possible deal as
the "Mar-a-Lago Accord".
China's willingness to make smaller commitments is driven by a
desire to stabilize U.S.-China relations and prevent the trade
dispute from spreading, which has become more salient as Washington
pressures its allies to jettison cooperation with Chinese tech
champions, including Huawei Technologies.
"We are afraid this conflict will be extended to other areas, even
affecting the relationship between China and the West. So we want to
control it. Maybe not solve all the problems, but control it and
calm it down," Tu said.
China hopes commitments to purchase more U.S. goods, along with
pledges to improve its reporting of subsidies at the World Trade
Organization and IPR enforcement can clinch an interim deal,
according to Chinese trade experts.
Trump has delayed the threatened hike in tariffs on some $200
billion in Chinese imports to 25 percent from 10 percent, which was
due to kick-in on Friday.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has signaled that
tariffs would remain an important tool to push China to address U.S.
concerns over Chinese industrial policies, saying in written
testimony at Congressional hearings last week that trade issues with
China were too serious to be resolved merely through stepped-up
purchases.
Zhang Huanbo, a researcher at the China Center for International
Economic Exchanges (CCIEE), a well-connected think-tank in Beijing,
said China would not agree to abolish subsidies but it would correct
market-distorting subsidies so they were "in-line with WTO rules".
Xi, who fundamentally believes in a strong role for the state and
the ruling Communist Party in the economy, does not want to, and
cannot, quickly dismantle decades of state planning, political
analysts say.
But he still has room to give the United States more market access
in the service industry and for agricultural products.
Shi Yinhong, director of the Center for American Studies at Renmin
University, said beyond those types of openings China had to attend
to its "own basic dignity and authority".
"If China makes too big a concession to the United States, it might
create domestic economic disorder. And also how would you explain it
to Communist Party members and the Chinese people?" said Shi, who
has advised the government on diplomatic matters.
(Reporting by Michael Martina, Kevin Yao, Xu Jing and Gao Liangping
in BEIJING; Editing by Alex Richardson)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |