Tesla's Musk nears deadline to respond to SEC contempt
bid
Send a link to a friend
[March 11, 2019]
Tesla Inc Chief Executive Elon Musk has
until the end of the day on Monday to explain why he should not be held
in contempt for recent tweets that U.S. securities regulators say
violated a September fraud settlement.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission asked a federal court in
Manhattan to hold Musk in contempt after he tweeted about Tesla's
production volume, saying he breached the agreement requiring him to get
company approval before sharing any material information on social
media.
The renewed public battle between Tesla's CEO and the SEC adds pressure
on Musk, the public face of the electric vehicle-maker who is struggling
to make it profitable after cutting the price of its Model 3 sedan to
$35,000.
Musk on Feb. 19 tweeted to his more than 24 million Twitter followers
that Tesla would make around 500,000 cars in 2019.
He corrected the tweet four hours later to say the annualized production
rate at year-end 2019 would probably be about 500,000, with deliveries
of about 400,000.
A lawyer for Tesla and Musk told the SEC that the CEO believed the
substance of the tweet had been pre-approved and disseminated when the
company released fourth-quarter earnings in January.
The September settlement between Musk, Tesla and the SEC resolved an SEC
lawsuit over claims Musk made on Twitter in August that he had "funding
secured" to take Tesla private at $420 per share. The SEC called those
tweets "false and misleading" and a go-private deal never materialized.
As part of that settlement, Musk stepped down as the company's chairman
and he and Tesla agreed to pay $20 million each in fines.
[to top of second column] |
Tesla CEO Elon Musk attends the Tesla Shanghai Gigafactory
groundbreaking ceremony in Shanghai, China January 7, 2019. REUTERS/Aly
Song/File Photo
Musk had called the regulator the "Shortseller Enrichment Commission" after the
settlement, and tweeted that "something is broken with SEC oversight" just one
day after the SEC started pursuing the contempt order. Hours later, U.S.
District Judge Alison Nathan set a March 11 deadline for Musk to respond.
Legal experts have said the SEC could now pursue multiple avenues, including a
higher fine, imposing further restrictions on Musk's activities or removing him
from Tesla's board or helm.
Tesla published a new communications policy in December for executives as part
of the settlement. It called for Tesla's general counsel and a newly designated
in-house securities law attorney to pre-approve any written statements about
Tesla that could be material.
A disclosure controls committee, made up of board members Brad Buss, Antonio
Gracias and James Murdoch, was tasked with overseeing compliance with the new
policy.
(Reporting By Alexandria Sage; Editing by Meredith Mazzilli)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|