U.S. judge may force Trump administration
to reunite more families separated at Mexico border
Send a link to a friend
[March 11, 2019]
(Reuters) - In a blow to the Trump
administration's U.S.-Mexico border strategy, a federal court judge in
California has expanded the number of migrant families separated at the
border that the government may be required to reunite.
San Diego-based U.S. District Court Judge Dana Sabraw late on Friday
issued a preliminary ruling that would potentially expand by thousands
the number of migrants included in a class-action lawsuit brought by the
American Civil Liberties Union.
Sabraw already ordered the Trump administration last year to reunite
more than 2,800 migrant children who were separated from their parents
at the U.S.-Mexico border under the administration's "zero tolerance"
policy.
But he will allow more separated families to join the class-action
lawsuit after a report released in January by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services' Inspector General, which identified
potentially thousands more families that had been separated as early as
July 1, 2017. The administration's "zero tolerance" policy did not take
effect until May 2018.
"The hallmark of a civilized society is measured by how it treats its
people and those within its borders," Sabraw said in his ruling.
Sabraw said that report was "a significant development in this case" and
its contents "are undisputed."
The Justice Department did not immediately respond to calls for comment.
The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump implemented the
zero-tolerance policy to criminally prosecute and jail all illegal
border crossers - even those traveling with their children - which led
to a wave of separations last year.
[to top of second column]
|
People gather on the U.S. side of the border fence between Mexico
and the United States during an inter-religious service against U.S.
President Donald Trump's border wall, in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico
February 26, 2019. REUTERS/Jose Luis Gonzalez -/File Photo
The policy sparked outrage when it became public, and the backlash
led Trump to sign an executive order reversing course on June 20,
2018.
The IG report said prior to the officially announced zero-tolerance
policy, the government began ramping up separations in 2017 for
other reasons related to a child’s safety and well-being, including
separating parents with criminal records or lack of proper
documents.
A Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman said in January after
the IG report came out that the practice of separating apprehended
minors from adults to protect the interests of the children has been
standard practice “for more than a decade.”
The report also said more than 100 minors, including more than two
dozen under age 5, were separated after the President’s executive
order.
“The court made clear that potentially thousands of children’s lives
are at stake and that the Trump administration cannot simply ignore
the devastation it has caused,” Lee Gelernt, ACLU lead attorney in
the class-action family separation lawsuit, said on Friday.
(Reporting by Valerie Volcovici in Washington; Editing by Matthew
Lewis)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|