U.S. college bribery scandal grates on
those who missed the cut
Send a link to a friend
[March 14, 2019]
By Daniel Trotta
(Reuters) - The U.S. college bribery
scandal has unleashed angst and fury among parents, students and
admissions experts, as an unprecedented criminal investigation draws
attention to the privileges afforded to wealthy Americans.
Hollywood actors and business executives are among 50 people charged
with taking part in the largest college admissions scandal in U.S.
history, which involved getting students into elite, highly selective
universities by paying bribes and cheating the admissions process.
Ordinary Americans were not amused.
"I've worked my butt off for four years trying to make myself seem
really presentable, studying two hours a week for the SAT (entrance
exam) and getting all As in my classes," said Connor Finn, 18, a senior
at John Marshall High school in Los Angeles. "And then the fact that
people would just pay hundreds of thousands of dollars and without the
hard work is really not rewarding at all," he said.
Finn's father, Michael, said the teenager applied to a dozen
universities, including University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA),
where the daughter of one couple charged in the scandal was enrolled.
Connor is still waiting for a response, his father said.
Dan Raffety, a college counselor at the Elgin Academy prep school near
Chicago, said he had a student with superb grades, perfect entrance exam
scores and a resume full of extracurricular activities who was denied
entry at Georgetown.
He said he was angered to think academically deserving students may have
lost a spot to cheaters.
ACCESS TO POWER
Besides academic excellence, elite schools offer access for their
graduates to a network of people in power.
"At some point this isn't really about education. This is about trying
to get access," Rafferty said.
Many elite universities give preference to "legacy" applicants: the
children of those who previously attended. In other cases, major
financial gifts, including multimillion-dollar donations to construct
buildings on campus, pave the way for the privileged. Both practices are
legal.
The competition can be fierce and seem unfair even to people of
privilege, however.
One wealthy Massachusetts parent said his son had excellent credentials
but still was denied entry to Ivy League Brown University, even after
the family spent thousands of dollars for a tutor to improve the boy's
entrance exam scores.
[to top of second column]
|
Media gathers outside the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building where
defendants attend an initial hearing in a racketeering case
involving the allegedly fraudulent admission of children to elite
universities, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., March 12,
2019. REUTERS/Mike Blake
Meanwhile, he said students whom he considered lesser academic
talents gained an advantage by going to private prep schools, whose
business model is to get students into elite universities.
"It's a booming business because parents are the ripest target in
the world. They'll pay and do anything for their kids. And this
(scandal) is an example of things gone awry," said the father, who
asked to remain anonymous so he could speak freely.
His son chose to stay in public school and ended up at Tufts
University, a highly rated school that nonetheless lacks Ivy League
cachet.
LOOKING FOR DIVERSITY, TOO
The top universities have such an excess of qualified applicants
they could limit their candidates to the best students with perfect
entrance exam scores, admissions experts say.
They are also looking for diversity, accepting high achieving poor
and minority students who cannot afford tutors and coaches.
"This scandal, most people would agree, is ridiculous," said Natasha
Kumar Warikoo, a graduate professor of education at Harvard and
author of "The Diversity Bargain," which examines how students at
elite universities view affirmative action.
"But beyond that we don't have a consensus in the United States
about what fair is," she added.
UCLA student Sandy Situ, 21, the daughter of immigrants, said the
scandal had made her think about the uphill battle for those who are
unable to attend the schools of their choice.
"I think about the resources that were taken away from them, the
chances that they could have achieved something better, all the
people who were turned away for people who could just pay their way
in," Situ said. "What a sad moment this is for America."
(Reporting by Daniel Trotta; additional reporting by Alex
Dobuzinskis and Rollo Ross; editing by Bill Tarrant and Rosalba
O'Brien)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |