California governor halts death penalty:
'I couldn't sleep'
Send a link to a friend
[March 14, 2019]
By Sharon Bernstein
SACRAMENTO (Reuters) - California Governor
Gavin Newsom on Wednesday halted the death penalty, saying he was deeply
troubled by the possibility of executing an innocent person even though
California voters have repeatedly backed capital punishment.
Newsom was convinced by statistics suggesting that perhaps dozens of the
737 inmates on the state's death row were innocent. The state has not
held an execution since 2006 but appeared to be moving toward resuming
them.
“I couldn’t sleep at night," Newsom said at the state capitol, adding
later, "Do we have the right to kill? I don't believe we do."
In signing an executive order that grants reprieve to death row inmates
and closes the state's execution chamber, Newsom waded into treacherous
political territory. Despite California's liberal reputation and growing
unease with the death penalty, voters have repeatedly repudiated efforts
to abolish it.
As recently as 2016, a measure to abolish the death penalty failed, and
another, aimed at speeding up executions, passed.
Republicans condemned the action on Wednesday, saying Newsom's action
was an offense to the families of victims of gruesome crimes.
Shawn Steele, a California representative on the Republican National
Committee, said the GOP would likely use the moratorium in upcoming
campaigns against Newsom and other Democrats.
"He's putting his party in a bad spot," Steele said.
Flanked by Democratic party leaders, Newsom said he decided to take the
move because of steps by the state toward resuming executions. No death
row inmates will be released under the order.
Newsom said he had anticipated that within a month he would have been
asked to sign off on a new protocol for administering lethal injections
to death row inmates, clearing the way for executions to begin again.
In addition, he said, 25 of the state’s death row inmates had exhausted
all of their appeals, meaning they would be in line for execution.
California's death row is crowded with inmates, many of whom have been
there for decades.
'MORAL LEADERSHIP'
Ellen Kreitzberg, a death penalty expert and opponent at Santa Clara
University law school in California, welcomed Newsom's move.
[to top of second column]
|
A guard closes a gate to death row during a media tour at San
Quentin State Prison in San Quentin, California, December 29, 2015.
REUTERS/Stephen Lam
"The moral leadership the governor is showing puts us in line with
other countries and other states in terms of abolishing the death
penalty," she said.
Newsom does not have the power to overturn California's death
penalty law, Kreitzberg said, but he can refuse to sign any death
warrants and can commute death sentences to life imprisonment.
On the campaign trail just last year, Newsom said he would respect
the voters' will with regard to the death penalty. But on Wednesday
he said that abstract idea faded as he was personally faced with the
possibility of signing death warrants.
He pointed to recent successful efforts to free inmates who were
wrongly convicted, saying that roughly one in 25 felons are later
found to be innocent.
With 737 inmates on death row, that equates to a possible 30 who are
innocent, he said. Of the 25 who have exhausted their appeals, one
could be innocent, he said.
"There could very well be a backlash," said State Senator Nancy
Skinner, a Democrat from Berkeley who supports Newsom's move. "But I
think that even people who support the death penalty don't want us
to execute an innocent person."
California has not put an inmate to death since 2006, amid legal
challenges to its execution protocols and discomfort among political
leaders. But prisoners convicted of murder continue to be sentenced
to death in local courtrooms.
(Reporting by Sharon Bernstein; editing by Bill Tarrant and Cynthia
Osterman)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|