| 
		Post-Katrina promise of oil money leaves 
		states shortchanged 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [March 15, 2019] 
		By Nichola Groom 
 (Reuters) - In 2006, a year after 
		hurricanes Katrina and Rita devastated New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, 
		the U.S. government struck a deal to give states in the region a growing 
		share of offshore drilling revenues to finance projects protecting them 
		from future monster storms.
 
 But revenues have fallen short of forecasts by half, leaving Louisiana 
		with a gap in financing for a $50 billion plan for projects to raise 
		levees, build flood gates, widen evacuation routes and protect its 
		eroding coastline.
 
 The shortfall, which federal officials blame on low oil prices, has 
		forced the state to put off critical projects as Louisiana's 
		congressional delegation pushes for another increase in its share of 
		federal oil revenues.
 
 The predicament shows how states hosting offshore drilling can get 
		burned by the industry's boom-and-bust cycles, providing a cautionary 
		tale for other states as the Trump administration proposes to expand 
		offshore drilling in the Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic oceans.
 
		
		 
		Louisiana's underfinanced coastal projects also highlight the hefty cost 
		of adapting to rising sea levels in a changing climate – a problem 
		scientists blame on consumption of fossil fuels. Several coastal states 
		including Florida, Massachusetts, California, and Washington have urged 
		the administration to leave them out of its drilling plans, arguing the 
		environmental costs outweigh the promised jobs and income.
 The stakes are particularly high for Louisiana, which has lost about 
		2,000 square miles of land over the last century because of Mississippi 
		River levees that block silt from reaching its swamps, the oil 
		industry's carving of canals through the marshes, and sea level rise 
		from climate change.
 
 But other states and nations should take notice of Louisiana's ordeal, 
		said U.S. Representative Garret Graves, a Republican who managed the 
		state's coastal restoration efforts before joining Congress in 2014.
 
 "What in Louisiana is a $50 or $70 billion problem, you are talking 
		hundreds of billions and trillions of dollars around the United States 
		and around the world," he said.
 
 FAULTY PROJECTIONS
 
 President George W. Bush signed the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act (GOMESA) 
		into law in December of 2006, providing storm-battered Louisiana, Texas, 
		Mississippi and Alabama a 37.5 percent share of federal oil-and-gas 
		royalties from offshore drilling.
 
 Previously, Gulf Coast states got 27 percent of revenues from federal 
		leases within three miles of their seaward boundaries.
 
 The changes followed national outrage over the administration's botched 
		emergency response to catastrophic flooding from the systematic failure 
		of the federally constructed levee system in New Orleans.
 
 Six months earlier, the chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
		admitted the agency had "missed something" in engineering the system, 
		which collapsed at water levels lower than they were designed to 
		withstand.
 
 For the first ten years, the changes applied to only a fraction of 
		offshore leases. But after that, in larger payouts starting last year, 
		it applied to all offshore leases off the coasts of these states.
 
 In 2013, the Department of Interior told Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana 
		and Texas that, under the second phase, they would have at least $375 
		million to split between them annually through 2055.
 
 But when the states' first payment came in late last year, the payout 
		totaled $188 million.
 
 “That has a huge impact on our planning efforts,” said Chip Kline, chair 
		of the state's Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority, which 
		oversees its 50-year, $50 billion coastal restoration plan.
 
 Another GOMESA recipient, Alabama, has also felt the pinch. Its 
		Republican governor, Kay Ivey, wrote a letter to then-Interior Secretary 
		Ryan Zinke in March 2018 urging him to support states seeking more 
		offshore revenues.
 
 “Expanded and enhanced revenue sharing will allow states to more 
		properly address the coastal impacts of offshore production,” she wrote.
 
 An official for the Texas General Land Office said the lower payouts had 
		not impacted its programs because it had budgeted conservatively. 
		Officials in Mississippi did not respond to requests for comment.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			An aerial view is seen of the town of Port Fourchon and its 
			surrounding marshes in Louisiana, May 11, 2010. REUTERS/Rick Wilking/File 
			Photo 
            
 
            Department of Interior officials said the shortfall was due to a 
			sharp drop in oil prices since 2013. It would not provide the 
			underlying oil price or production estimates it used in its 2013 
			projections, saying they were supplied by the White House Office of 
			Management and Budget (OMB) and were confidential.
 OMB did not respond to a Reuters request for the data.
 
 In an emailed statement, the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean 
			Energy Management said the bureau no longer provides long-term 
			projections for state revenue from the program.
 
 OUTSIZED IMPACT
 
 The shortfall had an outsized impact on Louisiana, which receives 
			almost half the GOMESA program’s revenues because of its geographic 
			proximity to the largest number of offshore wells. It received $82 
			million in its first phase-two payout, compared to the $177 million 
			it had been counting on.
 
 Among the shortfall's biggest impacts, Kline said, would be a delay 
			in completing the state’s massive "Morganza to the Gulf" hurricane 
			protection project, a system of levees and floodgates to protect 
			150,000 coastal residents of Terrebonne and Lafourche parishes from 
			a so-called 100-year storm, defined as having a 1 percent chance of 
			hitting in any given year.
 
 Lafourche parish is a major seafood and oil industry hub that 
			includes Port Fourchon, the land base for offshore oil and gas 
			services companies. Terrebonne and Lafourche parishes could each 
			lose about 40 percent of their land area in the next 50 years in the 
			absence of effective coastal protection measures, according to state 
			research.
 
 The Morganza project has been in the works for more than a decade 
			and is expected to cost about $2 billion. Local communities have 
			already agreed to tax increases twice to help fund the unfinished 
			project.
 
 "We've been piecemealing this," said Reggie Dupre, executive 
			director of the Terrebonne Levee and Conservation District.
 
 The funding gap also forced state officials to cancel a plan to 
			funnel 10 percent of offshore oil revenue to help finance road 
			improvements along hurricane evacuation routes.
 
             
			St. Bernard Parish, which was devastated by flooding after Hurricane 
			Katrina, has its own $1 billion coastal plan, with $600 million in 
			projects ready to move forward.
 It received $781,000 from the 2018 payments, according to John Lane, 
			coastal manager for the parish.
 
 "There just isn't enough money coming in," Lane said.
 
 LEGISLATIVE PUSH
 
 While Louisiana officials piece together funding for their projects 
			from other sources, its legislators in Congress are fighting for 
			changes to GOMESA, including increasing the percentage diverted to 
			states from 37.5 percent to 50 percent.
 
 One such bill, sponsored by Congressman Graves, passed a vote in the 
			House Committee on Natural Resources late last year, before the new 
			Congress was seated.
 
 But the idea faces resistance from those who believe the revenues 
			should be used on national instead of state priorities. Both 
			President Donald Trump and President Barack Obama’s administrations 
			had proposed budgets eliminating or reducing GOMESA payments to 
			finance federal programs instead, before being pushed back by 
			Congress.
 
 Graves says increasing the revenue share would be a smart move for 
			an administration promoting more offshore drilling.
 
 “Are you really going to treat (host states) poorly and not reward 
			them, or not keep them happy and healthy so they can continue being 
			productive?” Graves said.
 
 (Reporting by Nichola Groom; Editing by Richard Valdmanis and Brian 
			Thevenot)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |