Post-Katrina promise of oil money leaves
states shortchanged
Send a link to a friend
[March 15, 2019]
By Nichola Groom
(Reuters) - In 2006, a year after
hurricanes Katrina and Rita devastated New Orleans and the Gulf Coast,
the U.S. government struck a deal to give states in the region a growing
share of offshore drilling revenues to finance projects protecting them
from future monster storms.
But revenues have fallen short of forecasts by half, leaving Louisiana
with a gap in financing for a $50 billion plan for projects to raise
levees, build flood gates, widen evacuation routes and protect its
eroding coastline.
The shortfall, which federal officials blame on low oil prices, has
forced the state to put off critical projects as Louisiana's
congressional delegation pushes for another increase in its share of
federal oil revenues.
The predicament shows how states hosting offshore drilling can get
burned by the industry's boom-and-bust cycles, providing a cautionary
tale for other states as the Trump administration proposes to expand
offshore drilling in the Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic oceans.
Louisiana's underfinanced coastal projects also highlight the hefty cost
of adapting to rising sea levels in a changing climate – a problem
scientists blame on consumption of fossil fuels. Several coastal states
including Florida, Massachusetts, California, and Washington have urged
the administration to leave them out of its drilling plans, arguing the
environmental costs outweigh the promised jobs and income.
The stakes are particularly high for Louisiana, which has lost about
2,000 square miles of land over the last century because of Mississippi
River levees that block silt from reaching its swamps, the oil
industry's carving of canals through the marshes, and sea level rise
from climate change.
But other states and nations should take notice of Louisiana's ordeal,
said U.S. Representative Garret Graves, a Republican who managed the
state's coastal restoration efforts before joining Congress in 2014.
"What in Louisiana is a $50 or $70 billion problem, you are talking
hundreds of billions and trillions of dollars around the United States
and around the world," he said.
FAULTY PROJECTIONS
President George W. Bush signed the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act (GOMESA)
into law in December of 2006, providing storm-battered Louisiana, Texas,
Mississippi and Alabama a 37.5 percent share of federal oil-and-gas
royalties from offshore drilling.
Previously, Gulf Coast states got 27 percent of revenues from federal
leases within three miles of their seaward boundaries.
The changes followed national outrage over the administration's botched
emergency response to catastrophic flooding from the systematic failure
of the federally constructed levee system in New Orleans.
Six months earlier, the chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
admitted the agency had "missed something" in engineering the system,
which collapsed at water levels lower than they were designed to
withstand.
For the first ten years, the changes applied to only a fraction of
offshore leases. But after that, in larger payouts starting last year,
it applied to all offshore leases off the coasts of these states.
In 2013, the Department of Interior told Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana
and Texas that, under the second phase, they would have at least $375
million to split between them annually through 2055.
But when the states' first payment came in late last year, the payout
totaled $188 million.
“That has a huge impact on our planning efforts,” said Chip Kline, chair
of the state's Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority, which
oversees its 50-year, $50 billion coastal restoration plan.
Another GOMESA recipient, Alabama, has also felt the pinch. Its
Republican governor, Kay Ivey, wrote a letter to then-Interior Secretary
Ryan Zinke in March 2018 urging him to support states seeking more
offshore revenues.
“Expanded and enhanced revenue sharing will allow states to more
properly address the coastal impacts of offshore production,” she wrote.
An official for the Texas General Land Office said the lower payouts had
not impacted its programs because it had budgeted conservatively.
Officials in Mississippi did not respond to requests for comment.
[to top of second column]
|
An aerial view is seen of the town of Port Fourchon and its
surrounding marshes in Louisiana, May 11, 2010. REUTERS/Rick Wilking/File
Photo
Department of Interior officials said the shortfall was due to a
sharp drop in oil prices since 2013. It would not provide the
underlying oil price or production estimates it used in its 2013
projections, saying they were supplied by the White House Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and were confidential.
OMB did not respond to a Reuters request for the data.
In an emailed statement, the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management said the bureau no longer provides long-term
projections for state revenue from the program.
OUTSIZED IMPACT
The shortfall had an outsized impact on Louisiana, which receives
almost half the GOMESA program’s revenues because of its geographic
proximity to the largest number of offshore wells. It received $82
million in its first phase-two payout, compared to the $177 million
it had been counting on.
Among the shortfall's biggest impacts, Kline said, would be a delay
in completing the state’s massive "Morganza to the Gulf" hurricane
protection project, a system of levees and floodgates to protect
150,000 coastal residents of Terrebonne and Lafourche parishes from
a so-called 100-year storm, defined as having a 1 percent chance of
hitting in any given year.
Lafourche parish is a major seafood and oil industry hub that
includes Port Fourchon, the land base for offshore oil and gas
services companies. Terrebonne and Lafourche parishes could each
lose about 40 percent of their land area in the next 50 years in the
absence of effective coastal protection measures, according to state
research.
The Morganza project has been in the works for more than a decade
and is expected to cost about $2 billion. Local communities have
already agreed to tax increases twice to help fund the unfinished
project.
"We've been piecemealing this," said Reggie Dupre, executive
director of the Terrebonne Levee and Conservation District.
The funding gap also forced state officials to cancel a plan to
funnel 10 percent of offshore oil revenue to help finance road
improvements along hurricane evacuation routes.
St. Bernard Parish, which was devastated by flooding after Hurricane
Katrina, has its own $1 billion coastal plan, with $600 million in
projects ready to move forward.
It received $781,000 from the 2018 payments, according to John Lane,
coastal manager for the parish.
"There just isn't enough money coming in," Lane said.
LEGISLATIVE PUSH
While Louisiana officials piece together funding for their projects
from other sources, its legislators in Congress are fighting for
changes to GOMESA, including increasing the percentage diverted to
states from 37.5 percent to 50 percent.
One such bill, sponsored by Congressman Graves, passed a vote in the
House Committee on Natural Resources late last year, before the new
Congress was seated.
But the idea faces resistance from those who believe the revenues
should be used on national instead of state priorities. Both
President Donald Trump and President Barack Obama’s administrations
had proposed budgets eliminating or reducing GOMESA payments to
finance federal programs instead, before being pushed back by
Congress.
Graves says increasing the revenue share would be a smart move for
an administration promoting more offshore drilling.
“Are you really going to treat (host states) poorly and not reward
them, or not keep them happy and healthy so they can continue being
productive?” Graves said.
(Reporting by Nichola Groom; Editing by Richard Valdmanis and Brian
Thevenot)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |