Oil majors rush to dominate U.S. shale as independents
scale back
Send a link to a friend
[March 20, 2019]
By Jennifer Hiller
EDDY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO (Reuters) - In New Mexico's
Chihuahuan Desert, Exxon Mobil Corp is building a massive shale oil
project that its executives boast will allow it to ride out the
industry's notorious boom-and-bust cycles.
Workers at its Remuda lease near Carlsbad - part of a staff of 5,000
spread across New Mexico and Texas - are drilling wells, operating
fleets of hydraulic pumps and digging trenches for pipelines.
The sprawling site reflects the massive commitment to the Permian Basin
by oil majors, who have spent an estimated $10 billion buying acreage in
the top U.S. shale field since the beginning of 2017, according to
research firm Drillinginfo Inc.
The rising investment also reflects a recognition that Exxon, Chevron,
Royal Dutch Shell and BP Plc largely missed out on the first phase of
the Permian shale bonanza while more nimble independent producers, who
pioneered shale drilling technology, leased Permian acreage on the
cheap.
Now that the field has made the U.S. the world's top oil producer, Exxon
and other majors are moving aggressively to dominate the Permian and use
the oil to feed their sprawling pipeline, trading, logistics, refining
and chemicals businesses. The majors have 75 drilling rigs here this
month, up from 31 in 2017, according to Drillinginfo. Exxon operates 48
of those rigs and plans to add seven more this year.
The majors' expansion comes as smaller independent producers, who profit
only from selling the oil, are slowing exploration and cutting staff and
budgets amid investor pressure to control spending and boost returns.
Exxon Chief Executive Darren Woods said on March 6 that Exxon would
change "the way that game is played" in shale. Its size and businesses
could allow Exxon to earn double-digit percentage returns in the Permian
even if oil prices - now above $58 per barrel - crashed to below $35,
added Senior Vice President Neil Chapman.
Exxon's 1.6 million acres in the Permian means it can approach the field
as a "megaproject," said Staale Gjervik, the head of shale subsidiary
XTO Resources, whose headquarters was recently relocated to share space
with its logistics and refining businesses. The firm also recently
outlined plans to nearly double the capacity of a Gulf Coast refinery to
process shale oil.
"It sets us up to take a longer-term view," Gjervik said.
The majors' Permian investments position the field to compete with Saudi
Arabia as the world's top oil-producing region and solidifies the United
States as a powerhouse in global oil markets, said Daniel Yergin, an oil
historian and vice chairman of consultancy IHS Markit.
"A decade ago, capital investment was leaving the U.S.," he said. "Now
it's coming home in a very big way."
The Permian is expected to generate 5.4 million barrels per day (bpd) by
2023 - more than any single member of the Organization of the Petroleum
Exporting Countries (OPEC) other than Saudi Arabia, according to IHS
Markit. Production this month, at about 4 million bpd, will about double
that of two years ago.
Exxon, Chevron, Shell and BP now hold about 4.5 million acres in the
Permian Basin, according to Drillinginfo. Chevron and Exxon are poised
to become the biggest producers in the field, leapfrogging independent
producers such as Pioneer Natural Resources.
Pioneer recently dropped a pledge to hit 1 million bpd by 2026 amid
pressure from investors to boost returns. It shifted its emphasis to
generating cash flow and replaced its chief executive after posting
fourth quarter profit that missed Wall Street earnings targets by 36
cents a share.
Shell, meanwhile, is considering a multi-billion dollar deal to purchase
independent producer Endeavor Energy Resources, according to people
familiar with the talks. Shell declined to comment and Endeavor did not
respond to a request.
Chevron said it would produce 900,000 bpd by 2023, while Exxon forecast
pumping 1 million barrels per day by about 2024. That would give the two
companies one-third of Permian production within five years.
SMALLER PRODUCERS GET SQUEEZED
At first, the rise of the Permian was driven largely by nimble explorers
that pioneered new technology for hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and
horizontal drilling to unlock oil from shale rock, slashing production
costs.
[to top of second column] |
Natural gas flares off at a production facility owned by Exxon near
Carlsbad, New Mexico U.S., February 11, 2019. Picture taken February
11, 2019. To match Insight USA-SHALE/MAJORS . REUTERS/Nick Oxford
The advances by smaller companies initially left the majors behind. Now, those
technologies are easily copied and widely available from service firms.
Surging Permian production has overwhelmed pipelines and forced producers to
sell crude at a deep discount, sapping cash and profits of independents who,
unlike the majors, don't own their own pipeline networks.
Even as the majors have ramped up operations, the total number of drilling rigs
at work in the Permian has dropped to 464, from 493 in November, as independent
producers have slowed production, according to oilfield services provider Baker
Hughes.
Shell, by contrast, plans to keep expanding even if prices fall further, said
Amir Gerges, Shell's Permian general manager.
"We have a bit more resilience" than the independents, Gerges said.
In west Texas, the firm drills four to six wells at a time next to one another,
a process called cube development that targets multiple layers of shale as deep
as 8,000 feet.
Cube development is expensive and can take months, making it an option only for
the majors and the largest independent producers. Shell has used the tactic to
double production in two years, to 145,000 bpd.
The largest oil firms can also take advantage of their volume-buying power even
if service companies raise prices for supplies or drilling and fracking crews,
said Andrew Dittmar, a Drillinginfo analyst.
"It’s like buying at Costco versus a neighborhood market," Dittmar said.
The majors' rush into the market means smaller companies are going to struggle
to compete for service contracts and pay higher prices, said Roy Martin, analyst
with energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie.
"When you’re sitting across the negotiating table from the majors, the chips are
stacked on their side," he said.
REBIRTH
The revival of interest in the Permian marks a reversal from the late 1990s,
when production had been falling for two decades.
"All the majors and all the companies with names you’ve heard left with their
employees," said Karr Ingham, an oil and gas economist. "Conventional wisdom was
this place was going to dry up."
Chevron was the only major that stayed in the Permian. It holds 2.3 million
acres and owns most of its mineral rights, too, but until recently left drilling
to others.
But this month, Chief Executive Mike Wirth called the Permian its best bet for
delivering profits "north of 30 percent at low oil prices."
"There's nothing we can invest in that delivers higher rates of return," Wirth
said this month at its annual investor meeting in New York.
'HUNGER AND FEAR'
Matt Gallagher, CEO of Parsley Energy Inc, calls the majors' investments "the
best form of flattery" for independents operating here.
Parsley holds 192,000 Permian acres - most of which was snatched up on the cheap
during oil busts - and sees its smaller size as an advantage in shale.
"We’re not finished yet," Gallagher said. "We can move very quickly."
The majors have greater infrastructure, but independents continue to innovate
and design better wells, said Allen Gilmer, a co-founder of Drillinginfo.
"Nothing is a bigger motivator than, 'Am I going to be alive tomorrow?'" Gilmer
said. "Hunger and fear is something that every independent oil-and-gas person
knows - and that something no major oil-and-gas person has ever felt in their
career."
(Reporting by Jennifer Hiller; Additional reporting by David French; Editing by
Gary McWilliams and Brian Thevenot)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |