| 
		Solar and wind firms call the 'Green New 
		Deal’ too extreme 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [March 21, 2019] 
		By Valerie Volcovici and Nichola Groom 
 WASHINGTON/LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - U.S. 
		solar and wind power companies may have the most to gain from the Green 
		New Deal, an ambitious proposal backed by several Democratic 
		presidential candidates to end U.S. fossil fuel consumption within a 
		decade.
 
 But do not expect the renewable energy firms to endorse it.
 
 Representatives of America’s clean energy companies are withholding 
		their support for the climate-fighting plan, calling it unrealistic and 
		too politically divisive for an industry keen to grow in both red and 
		blue states.
 
 The cool reaction reflects the difficulty that progressive politicians 
		vying for the White House may have in selling aggressive global-warming 
		policy to the business community and more moderate voters.
 
 It also underscores a new reality for U.S. solar and wind power 
		companies long associated with the environmental left: As they have 
		improved technology and lowered prices, their growth is shifting from 
		politically liberal coastal states to the more conservative heartland, 
		where skepticism of climate change and government subsidies runs high.
 
		
		 
		
 “If you just broadly endorse the Green New Deal, you are liable to upset 
		one side of the aisle or the other. And that's not constructive," said 
		Tom Werner, the CEO of SunPower Corp, one of the nation’s biggest solar 
		power companies.
 
 “The idea that you could go 100 percent (clean energy) in 10 years would 
		require a lot of things happening perfectly, simultaneously," he said. 
		"You'd have to have bipartisan support, 52-state support."
 
 The Green New Deal was introduced last month by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 
		a Democrat Congresswoman from New York, along with fellow Democrat 
		Senator Edward Markey of Massachusetts. It has since become the center 
		of a renewed debate in Washington about how vigorously the government 
		must act to address climate change.
 
 The Congressional resolution, which has no force of law, calls for the 
		federal government to make investments to achieve net-zero greenhouse 
		gas emissions in a decade by meeting 100 percent of America's power 
		demand with clean, renewable sources such as solar, wind, hydroelectric, 
		or geothermal energy.
 
 It also calls for massive investments in green infrastructure projects 
		like "smart grids" to improve efficiency, along with a guarantee of 
		millions of high-wage jobs with paid vacations, medical leave and 
		retirement security. The resolution does not get into detail about how 
		subsequent legislation would achieve these goals.
 
 So far, at least eight Democratic presidential hopefuls – including 
		senators Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts 
		and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota – have endorsed the plan as they seek to 
		stand in stark opposition to the pro-drilling policies of President 
		Donald Trump.
 
 Trump's fellow Republicans have widely panned the Green New Deal, saying 
		it would cost trillions of dollars of taxpayer money, may be technically 
		unfeasible, and smacks of radical socialism.
 
 Rhiana Gunn Wright, founder of the think tank New Consensus, which is 
		drawing up Green New Deal policies, said her group will not estimate 
		costs of the plan until it is more fully drafted next year. She said 
		opponents' estimates are premature and do not account for the benefits 
		of climate action and the costs of inaction.
 
 
		
		 
		The feasibility of the proposal has been a source of concern for the 
		clean energy industry, too.
 
 "We love the enthusiasm the Green New Deal has brought to the climate 
		issue ... but we need to operate in political reality,” said Dan 
		Whitten, vice president of public affairs at the Solar Energy Industries 
		Association, the solar industry’s main lobby group.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Senator Ed 
			Markey (D-MA) hold a news conference for their proposed "Green New 
			Deal" to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in 10 years, at 
			the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S. February 7, 2019. 
			REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst 
            
 
            Another concern is the fact that the plan extends beyond energy and 
			climate policies to include guarantees of jobs, training and 
			healthcare for communities affected by climate change, said Greg 
			Wetstone, president of the American Council on Renewable Energy, a 
			non-profit organization promoting renewable energy industries.
 “It creates controversy and complexity, tying this to issues that 
			are not in our sphere," he said.
 
 Representatives of renewable energy firms Sunrun and Sunnova Energy 
			said they were happy the Green New Deal was drawing so much 
			attention to clean industry but stopped short of endorsing the plan.
 
 “The Green New Deal has sparked an important conversation, and we’re 
			excited to be part of it,” said Alex McDonough, Vice President of 
			Public Policy at Sunrun.
 
 INROADS IN TRUMP COUNTRY
 
 The U.S. solar and wind industries have expanded over the last 
			decade, thanks to lucrative government subsidies, and now employ 
			some 350,000 workers nationwide - more than four times more than the 
			coal sector, according to the 2019 U.S. Energy and Employment Report 
			released this month.
 
 While the growth began in liberal-leaning regions such as California 
			and New England, it has more recently come in states that voted 
			heavily for President Donald Trump in 2016, including Texas, North 
			Carolina, Iowa and Florida, according to data from the American Wind 
			Energy Association, Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables and SEIA.
 
 That has helped strengthen the industry’s appeal to Republican 
			lawmakers, allowing it to rebrand as a jobs engine in addition to a 
			tool for combating global warming. And during the last election 
			cycle in 2018, solar and wind companies contributed significantly 
			more money to Republican candidates than to their traditional 
			Democratic allies.
 
 "We have raised these industries above science experiments and feel-goodery, 
			and we are now real businesses and can’t just play to one half of 
			the country," said one renewable sector lobbyist, who asked not to 
			be named discussing the topic.
 
             
            
 "Staying out of the line of fire is the goal of most companies and 
			trade associations," said another clean energy industry 
			representative. “There will be a real danger for our industry and 
			companies if they are shouting out about the Green New Deal from the 
			rooftops.”
 
 The Sunrise Movement, a grassroots group that brought the Green New 
			Deal into the national spotlight by holding demonstrations and 
			confronting lawmakers on video, said it was aware of the reticence 
			of green energy companies to back their proposal.
 
 “We’ve met with companies and industries who could have a lot to 
			gain from the Green New Deal, but the politics at this stage are too 
			difficult to navigate,” Sunrise co-founder Evan Weber said.
 
 He said Sunrise had met with the SEIA and AWEA, along with other 
			executives.
 
 Weber said industry support for the Green New Deal would be welcomed 
			but is not vital: "We don’t expect all of them to be a strong 
			advocate for the Green New Deal until the politics shift."
 
 (Reporting by Valerie Volcovici and Nichola Groom; Editing by 
			Richard Valdmanis and Brian Thevenot)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |