| 
		Climate change's fingerprints are on U.S. 
		Midwest floods: scientists 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [March 22, 2019] 
		By Timothy Gardner 
 (Reuters) - Climate change played a hand in 
		the deadly floods in the U.S. upper Midwest that have damaged crops and 
		drowned livestock, scientists said on Thursday, while a Trump 
		administration official said more homework was needed before making that 
		link.
 
 The "bomb cyclone" that dumped rain on Nebraska, Iowa and Missouri and 
		killed at least four people now threatens a wider region downstream of 
		swollen rivers and smashed levees.
 
 Manmade greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere, warming the oceans 
		and making the air above them more humid, scientists said. When a storm 
		picks up and eventually spits out that moisture, it can be devastating 
		for people caught below.
 
 "The atmosphere is pretty close to fully saturated, it's got all the 
		water it can take," said Michael Wehner, a senior scientist at the 
		Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
 
 Big storms like the bomb cyclone and Hurricane Harvey, which smacked 
		Houston in 2017 with record downpours, are where the impact of climate 
		change can most clearly be seen, he said, adding that climate change's 
		fingerprints were all over the recent storm.
 
		
		 
		
 "I don't think it's a starring role, but it's a strong supporting role," 
		said Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist at the U.S. National Center for 
		Atmospheric Research, a federally-funded office, of climate change's 
		role in the Midwest floods.
 
 He said the bomb cyclone was carrying vast amounts of moisture from the 
		Pacific up to 1,500 miles (2,400 km) away.
 
 Wehner said the flooding was consistent with projections in a government 
		report issued last November, the National Climate Assessment Volume II, 
		that said climate change would boost costs in industries from farming to 
		fisheries and energy production by increasing the frequency of powerful 
		storms.
 
 That report, mandated by Congress, was compiled by 13 federal 
		departments and agencies, but was called inaccurate by the White House.
 
 President Donald Trump has cast doubt on mainstream climate change 
		science and announced his intention to withdraw the United States from 
		the 2015 Paris agreement, an international accord to fight climate 
		change, saying it is too costly.
 
		The White House National Security Council has also been considering the 
		formation of a panel to assess science used in military and intelligence 
		reports, which have angered Trump by concluding climate change poses a 
		national security threat.
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Flooded areas are seen near Nebraska City, Nebraska, U.S., March 20, 
			2019 in this still image taken from a video obtained from social 
			media on March 21, 2019. Courtesy Nebraska State Patrol/via REUTERS 
            
 
            The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment 
			about the link between climate change and the storm.
 'FOOL'S ERRAND'
 
 Deke Arndt, chief of climate monitoring at the National Centers for 
			Environmental Information, an arm of the National Oceanic and 
			Atmospheric Administration, said that the type of heavy 
			precipitation that immediately led to the upper Midwest floods is 
			generally increasing over time.
 
 But trying to link the role of climate change to an individual event 
			is a "fool's errand" akin to trying to determine the cause of a car 
			crash while the wheels are still spinning, he told reporters on a 
			conference call.
 
 More research needs to be done to find a definitive answer on 
			climate's link to the floods, Arndt said.
 
 NOAA officials said on the call they expect the floods to continue 
			through May and get more dire as snow melts and water continues to 
			flow downstream.
 
 Donald Wuebbles, a professor of atmospheric sciences at University 
			of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, agreed that climate change likely 
			made the Midwest floods worse.
 
 But he said that investments in levees and other infrastructure to 
			deal with changes have not kept up, making communities more 
			vulnerable.
 
 "People have developed infrastructure for the way the climate was in 
			the past, and haven't really been able to evolve to the climate of 
			now and the future," said Wuebbles.
 
 (Reporting by Timothy Gardner in Washington; additional reporting by 
			Nichola Groom in Los Angeles; editing by Richard Valdmanis and 
			Rosalba O'Brien)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			 |