| 
		Explainer: Why Trump's legal woes go 
		beyond the Mueller report 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [March 25, 2019] 
		By Jan Wolfe 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The closure of 
		Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russia's role in the 
		2016 U.S. election does not mark the end of legal worries for President 
		Donald Trump and people close to him. Other continuing investigations 
		and litigation are focusing on issues including his businesses and 
		financial dealings, personal conduct, charitable foundation and 
		inaugural committee.
 
 The special counsel on Friday submitted his confidential report on the 
		investigation to U.S. Attorney General William Barr, who must decide on 
		how much of it to make public. On Sunday Barr released a summary of 
		Mueller's findings that said the investigation did not find that 
		President Donald Trump committed a crime but also does not exonerate 
		him.
 
 The summary also said Mueller found no evidence that any member of 
		Trump's election campaign conspired with Russia during the election.
 
 While Mueller's probe has ended, the other investigations, pursued by 
		prosecutors at the federal and state level, could result in charges 
		beyond those brought by Mueller or civil liability.
 
 
		
		 
		The U.S. Justice Department has a decades-old policy that a sitting 
		president cannot face criminal charges, so such a case against Trump 
		would be unlikely while he is in office even if there were evidence of 
		wrongdoing. Some legal experts have argued the department is wrong and 
		that a president is not immune from prosecution. Either way, Trump 
		potentially could face charges once he is out of office.
 
 Here is an explanation of some criminal investigations and civil 
		lawsuits still under way.
 
 MUELLER'S CRIMINAL CASES
 
 Mueller charged 34 individuals and three companies. Several of those 
		cases resulted in guilty pleas and one case went to trial, with former 
		Trump Campaign Chairman Paul Manafort convicted in August 2018 of eight 
		criminal counts, including bank fraud and tax fraud. Longtime Trump 
		adviser Roger Stone was indicted in January of this year and pleaded not 
		guilty, but his trial is still pending. There are other cases involving 
		indicted Russians that have not gone to trial. Other prosecutors within 
		the Justice Department will likely take over criminal cases begun by 
		Mueller, legal experts said.
 
 BUSINESS PRACTICES AND FINANCIAL DEALINGS
 
 Trump may face significant peril from federal prosecutors in Manhattan, 
		according to legal experts. His former personal lawyer Michael Cohen 
		said in Feb. 27 congressional testimony that the U.S. Attorney's Office 
		for the Southern District of New York is examining Trump's business 
		practices and financial dealings. Cohen already has implicated Trump in 
		campaign finance law violations to which he pleaded guilty in August 
		2018 as part of the Southern District investigation.
 
 Cohen admitted he violated campaign finance laws by arranging, at 
		Trump's direction, "hush money" payments shortly before the 2016 
		presidential election to porn film actress Stormy Daniels and former 
		Playboy magazine model Karen McDougal to prevent damage to Trump's 
		candidacy. Both women said they had sexual relationships with Trump more 
		than a decade ago. He has denied that.
 
 Prosecutors said the payments constituted illegal campaign contributions 
		intended to influence the election. Under federal election laws, such 
		donations cannot exceed $2,700 and need to be publicly disclosed. 
		Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, received $130,000. 
		McDougal received $150,000.
 
		 
		
 The New York investigation has involved longtime Trump ally David 
		Pecker, publisher of the National Enquirer tabloid newspaper, who 
		admitted to paying McDougal for the rights to her story and then 
		suppressing it to influence the election, an arrangement called "catch 
		and kill."
 
 During his Feb. 27 congressional hearing, Cohen said he was in "constant 
		contact" with federal prosecutors in Manhattan, and said other crimes 
		and wrongdoing by Trump are being investigated by them, though he did 
		not offer details. Cohen said he could not testify about the nature of 
		his last conversation with Trump in early 2018 because it was under 
		investigation by the federal prosecutors in New York.
 
 NEW YORK STATE CHARGES AGAINST MANAFORT
 
 The Manhattan district attorney's office is exploring criminal charges 
		against Paul Manafort, President Donald Trump's former campaign 
		chairman, over financial crimes related to unpaid state taxes and 
		possibly loans. In cases bought by Mueller, Manafort in 2018 was 
		convicted of tax fraud, bank fraud and failing to disclose foreign bank 
		accounts in Virginia and pleaded guilty to two conspiracy charges in 
		Washington. He was sentenced to a combined 7-1/2 years in prison in the 
		two cases. Trump has not ruled out granting Manafort a pardon. The 
		president would not be able to pardon Manafort if he is convicted of 
		charges brought by the Manhattan district attorney because they would 
		not be federal crimes. However, New York has broad double-jeopardy 
		protections that usually prevent the state from prosecuting a person for 
		crimes arising from the same criminal conduct the federal government has 
		prosecuted before.
 
		SUMMER ZERVOS DEFAMATION LAWSUIT
 A defamation lawsuit against Trump by Summer Zervos, a former contestant 
		on his reality television show "The Apprentice," continues in New York 
		state court after a judge in 2018 allowed it to proceed. Zervos sued 
		Trump after he called her and other women who have accused him of sexual 
		misconduct liars and retweeted a post labeling her claims a hoax.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			President Donald Trump speaks about the crisis in Venezuela during a 
			visit to Florida International University in Miami, Florida, U.S., 
			February 18, 2019. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque 
            
 
            Trump has agreed to provide written answers to questions from Zervos 
			by Sept. 28, according to a court filing.
 Zervos accused Trump of kissing her against her will at his New York 
			office in 2007 and later groping her at a meeting at a hotel in 
			California. More than a dozen women have accused Trump of making 
			unwanted sexual advances against them years before he entered 
			politics.
 
 Marc Kasowitz, a lawyer for Trump, had argued that the lawsuit 
			unconstitutionally impedes the president from performing his duties. 
			An appeals court rejected that argument on March 14 by a 3-2 vote. 
			Kasowitz said he would appeal the decision to the state's highest 
			court.
 
 Separately, two lawsuits against Trump brought by porn star Stormy 
			Daniels were dismissed.
 
 THE TRUMP FOUNDATION
 
 A lawsuit filed by the New York state Attorney General's Office has 
			already led the Donald J. Trump Foundation, which was presented as 
			the charitable arm of Trump's business empire, to agree in December 
			2018 to dissolve, and the litigation continues.
 
 The state is seeking an order banning Trump and his three eldest 
			children from leadership roles in any other New York charity. Trump 
			has said the lawsuit was concocted by "sleazy New York Democrats." 
			The state's Democratic attorney general accused the foundation of 
			being "engaged in a "shocking pattern of illegality" and 
			"functioning as little more than a checkbook to serve Mr. Trump's 
			business and political interests" in violation of federal law.
 
 The attorney general's office alleged Trump and his family members 
			used the charity to pay off his legal debts and purchase personal 
			items. The foundation agreed to dissolve and give away all its 
			remaining assets under court supervision.
 
            
			 
            
 "EMOLUMENTS" LAWSUIT
 
 Trump is accused in a lawsuit filed by the Democratic attorneys 
			general of Maryland and the District of Columbia of violating 
			anti-corruption provisions of the U.S. Constitution through his 
			businesses' dealings with foreign governments.
 
 The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard 
			oral arguments on March 19 in the Trump administration's appeal of 
			U.S. District Judge Peter Messitte's 2018 rulings allowing the case 
			to proceed.
 
 The Constitution's "emoluments clause" bars U.S. officials from 
			accepting payments from foreign governments and the governments of 
			U.S. states without congressional approval. The lawsuit stated that 
			because Trump did not divest himself of his business empire, 
			spending by foreign governments at the Trump International Hotel in 
			Washington amounts to unconstitutional gifts, or "emoluments," to 
			the president.
 
 The three appeals court judges, all appointed by Republican 
			presidents, expressed approval toward Trump's arguments in the case 
			and signaled they might dismiss it, but did not issue a ruling.
 
 Some experts have said the case will eventually be heard by the U.S. 
			Supreme Court.
 
 TRUMP INAUGURAL COMMITTEE
 
 Federal prosecutors in New York are investigating whether the 
			committee that organized Trump's inauguration in January 2017 
			accepted illegal donations from foreigners, misused funds or 
			brokered special access to the administration for donors.
 
 Federal election law prohibits foreigners from donating to U.S. 
			political campaigns or inaugural committees, and corruption laws ban 
			donors from making contributions in exchange for political favors.
 
 Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani said in December 2018 that the president 
			was not involved in his inaugural committee. The $107 million raised 
			by the committee, which was chaired by real estate developer and 
			investor Thomas Barrack, was the largest in history, according to 
			Federal Election Commission filings.
 
 
             
			IMPEACHMENT
 
 Under the Constitution, the president, vice president and "all civil 
			officers of the United States" can be removed from office by 
			Congress through the impeachment process for "treason, bribery, or 
			other high crimes and misdemeanors." The House of Representatives 
			acts as the accuser - voting on whether to bring specific charges 
			such as obstruction of justice - and the Senate then conducts a 
			trial with House members acting as prosecutors and the individual 
			senators serving as jurors. A simple majority vote is needed in the 
			House to impeach. A two-thirds majority is required in the Senate to 
			convict and remove.
 
 (Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Bill Trott and Jonathan Oatis)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |