| 
			
			 Researchers don't know whether the later diagnoses are due to 
			genetics, the environment, possible biases in the healthcare system 
			- or some combination of reasons. 
 The study of health data from 6.9 million Danish people found that 
			across hundreds of diseases, women on average were diagnosed when 
			they were about four years older than the age at which the 
			conditions were recognized in men.
 
 "We're not just looking at one disease here, we're looking at all 
			diseases and we are looking at an entire population, from cradle to 
			grave," lead author Søren Brunak from the University of Copenhagen 
			told Reuters Health by phone.
 
 On average, women received cancer diagnoses 2.5 years after men. 
			They received diagnoses for metabolic diseases like diabetes 4.5 
			years later.
 
			
			 
			
 "(This) actually surprised us quite a lot," Brunak said. "Men 
			generally have a tendency to get to the doctor later... So 
			presumably the difference in onset is even larger."
 
 Brunak and his team considered incidence rates of diseases in the 18 
			broad categories of the ICD-10 diagnosis system managed by the World 
			Health Organization.
 
 The study wasn't designed to explain the causes of the differences. 
			Another limitation is that researchers only looked at diagnoses made 
			in hospitalized patients.
 
 Dr. Noel Bairey Merz, director of the Barbra Streisand Women's Heart 
			Center at the Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, who was not 
			involved in the study, pointed out to Reuters Health that the study 
			therefore lacks information on age at diagnosis for people who 
			didn't require hospitalization.
 
 "On the other hand," she said, "being hospitalized is a sign of a 
			serious illness, so (that) adds significance to the diagnosis and 
			supports that disease onset may be later in women."
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			Brunak's study, published in Nature Communications, showed that the 
			bone-thinning disease osteoporosis was a notable exception to the 
			trend. Here, women were typically diagnosed before they suffered a 
			fracture, while the opposite was true for men.
 "I am fascinated by this study, which generally confirms all that I 
			present in my Stanford course on Sex and Gender in Human Physiology 
			and Disease," said Marcia Stefanick, Director of Stanford 
			University's Women's Health and Sex Differences in Medicine Center.
 
 "When men get diseases that most healthcare professionals consider 
			'women's diseases,' they are diagnosed at later, more serious 
			stages, and vice versa," Stefanick, who was not involved with the 
			study, told Reuters Health in an email.
 
			"For example, women are diagnosed later for heart disease, not only 
			because it is still largely considered a 'man's disease', but also 
			because our diagnostic tests are male-biased, in terms in terms of 
			'typical' being the male presentation. All medical schools and 
			healthcare training should emphasize both biological sex differences 
			and gender biases so healthcare professionals are aware of 
			unconscious biases."
 Bairey Merz agreed, adding that more research is needed to determine 
			if the gender differences in age at diagnosis are "real" and whether 
			they are linked to gender bias, actual biological sex differences or 
			random error associations.
 
			
			 
			SOURCE: https://go.nature.com/2OosMJF Nature Communications, online 
			February 8, 2019.
 (Reporting by Tamara Mathias in Bengaluru)
 
			[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |